Mary Jane Schmitt
The EMPower Project's goal is to extend K-12 mathematics curricular reforms
to adults and out-of-school youth, especially those who enroll in remedial
and developmental adult basic education, high school equivalency and community
college programs. The curriculum has potential use in other environments:
workplace, parent, and para-professional education programs.
Over the course of four years (2000-2004), a collaborative group of teachers
and researchers with expertise in adult numeracy education and K-12 mathematics
reform has developed and field tested contextualized curriculum units organized
around the topic areas of number sense; patterns, functions, and relations;
geometry and measurement; and data, statistics, and graphs. The team has created
a model for a mathematics curriculum that offers content consistent with the
Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM, 2000) and other frameworks
that are adult-focused, such as the Equipped for the Future Content Standards
(Stein, 2000), the Massachusetts ABE Curriculum Frameworks for Mathematics
and Numeracy (Massachusetts Department of Education, 2001), and the Adult
Literacy and Lifeskills Survey numeracy framework (Gal, vanGroenestijn, Manly,
Schmitt, & Tout, 1999). The curriculum fosters a pedagogy of learning
for understanding; embeds teacher support throughout; and has a structure
that is transformative yet realistic for existing adult education multi-leveled
classrooms. EMPower's content and pedagogy profoundly challenge prevalent
instructional practice in remedial mathematics education.
The project was conceived as a multi-dimensional intervention: curriculum
development, professional development and research. EMPower uses research
and evaluation at all stages of the developmental process, both to inform
the writing of the curriculum and to understand what changes might stem from
its use. Evaluation activities have helped to highlight the impacts on students,
classrooms, and teachers. Although findings are preliminary and based on limited
samples, methods, and designs, they are promising.
Guiding Questions
- What is the range of mathematical understandings within a class and across
classes?
- What are the shifts in teachers' facilitation styles and views of students'
mathematical understandings?
- What supports change?