|
Printable
Version Evolution Debate in Alabama (2-11-05)
Untitled Document
Senate Bill 336, the Academic Freedom Act, did not make its way to
the floor for a vote before the final day of the Alabama State legislative
session on May 17th. As such, the bill is no longer; however, many
people think this will continue to be an issue in Alabama either during
a special session of the legislature (if one is called) or during
next year's session. (5/24/04)
On April 8th, the Alabama Senate passed SB 336, the "Academic
Freedom Act", which provides protection for both teachers and
students who want to freely discuss creationism, as long as the discussion
is raised in the context of approved curricula material. The students
must also show "acceptable understanding" of the course
materials. Meaning, as long as evolution is in the curriculum, then
alternate viewpoints (whether based on science or not) may legally
be discussed. Representative Jim Carns introduced HB
391 in the Alabama House of Representatives on February 12th.
HB 391 has passed through the Education Committee and is now awaiting
a full House vote which has not yet been scheduled. (4/19/04)

On February 17th Alabama State Senator Wendell
Mitchell, introduced a bill (SB
336) into the State Senate that would allow all theories on creation
to be taught in Alabama public schools. According to the Montgomery
Advisor, Mitchell remarked, "This bill will level the playing
field because it allows a teacher to bring forward the biblical creation
story of humankind." The bill provides protection for both teachers
and students who want to freely discuss creationism, as long as the
discussion is raised in the context of approved curricula material
and that the students show "acceptable understanding" of
the course materials. The bill is currently under consideration by
the Education Committee. (2/25/04)

The Academic Freedom Act was reintroduced as House Bill 352 and Senate
Bill 240. The two identical bills retain the language of its predecessors,
to protect the right of teachers "to present scientific critiques
of prevailing scientific theories" and the right of students
to "hold positions regarding scientific views," in the context
of subjects concerning "biological and chemical origins."
SB 240 was referred to the Senate Committee on Constitution, Campaign
Financial, Ethics, and Elections, while HB 352 was referred to the
House Committee on Education. (2/11/05)
Sources: Montgomery Advisor, National Center for Science Education
Contributed by Emily M. Lehr, AGI Government Affairs Program; 2004
AGI/AAPG Spring Semester Intern Gayle Levy; Bridget Martin, 2004 AGI/AIPG
Summer Intern; and Katie Ackerly, 2005 AGI/AAPG Spring Intern.
Please send any comments or requests for information to AGI
Government Affairs Program.
Last updated on February 11, 2005
|