|
Printable
Version
FY2005 Energy and Water Appropriations (11-29-04)
The Energy and Water Appropriations bill provides funding for the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
the Department of Energy (DOE;
other than fossil energy and energy efficiency programs), the Department
of the Interior's Bureau
of Reclamation, and several independent agencies. Programs
of interest to the geosciences include DOE programs for renewable
energy (particularly geothermal) and activities within the Office
of Science, such as the Basic
Energy Science program which has a geoscience division, as well
as some activities in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This
bill also funds the Yucca Mountain
site characterization activities and environmental remediation of
the nuclear weapons complex at DOE.
|
FY05 Energy and
Water Appropriations Process
|
|
Account
|
FY04 Enacted
($million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Department of Energy (total)
|
23,280
|
23,570
|
27,988
|
--
|
23,294
|
23,108
|
|
Renewable Energy Resources
|
370
|
374
|
343
|
--
|
386
|
383
|
|
--Geothermal Technology Development
|
25.5
|
25.8
|
25.8
|
--
|
25.7
|
25.5
|
|
--Hydropower
|
4.9
|
6
|
5
|
--
|
4.94
|
4.90
|
|
Non-Defense Site Acceleration Completion
|
163
|
151.8
|
151.8
|
--
|
152
|
150
|
|
Non-Defense Environmental Services
|
306
|
291.3
|
291.3
|
--
|
291
|
287
|
|
Defense Environmental Management
|
6,626
|
6,952
|
6,889
|
--
|
7,034
|
6,936
|
|
--Defense Site Acceleration Completion
|
5,576
|
5,970
|
5,930
|
--
|
938
|
924
|
|
--Defense Environmental Services
|
1,012
|
982
|
958
|
--
|
938
|
925
|
|
Basic Energy Sciences
|
1,010
|
1,063
|
1,076
|
--
|
1,114
|
1,098
|
|
--Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Energy
Biosciences
|
219
|
228
|
232
|
--
|
253
|
251
|
|
Nuclear Waste Disposal*
|
190
|
749
|
0
|
--
|
346
|
341
|
|
Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal*
|
387
|
131
|
131
|
--
|
231
|
228
|
|
National Climate Change Technology Initiative
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
--
|
0
|
0
|
* These two accounts combined fund the Yucca Mountain project.
Department of Energy
The total Department of Energy request for FY 2005 is $23.5 billion,
an increase of 1.8% from last year's funding level. The department
is responsible for a wide array of missions, most not related to energy.
The two largest parts of the budget are the National Nuclear Security
Administration ($9 billion), which oversees the development and management
of the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile, and environmental cleanup
of former nuclear weapons production facilities ($14 billion).
Office of Science
Total funding for the DOE Office of Science was cut by 1% to $3.43
billion in the president's request. Within the Office of Science,
the Basic Energy Sciences (BES) programs would receive $1.06 billion,
up 5.2%. The Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biological Energy
Sciences account within BES is slated to receive $228 million, an
increase of 4% above last year's request. Also within the Office of
Science, the Biological and Environmental Research program would receive
nearly $501 million, down almost 22% from last year, but up slightly
from the FY03 budget.
Nuclear Waste Disposal
Last year's decision by the President and Congress to accept the Yucca
Mountain site as the nation's permanent disposal site for high-level
nuclear waste means that the project has moved into its second phase.
After more than 20 years and $4 billion in site characterization,
funding for Yucca Mountain will now be focused primarily on activities
to support the submission of a license application to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission. The budget request includes $591 million for
licensing and program management activities, basically flat from last
year's request but an increase of nearly 58% from the allocation two
years ago. Within this amount, there is a sizable jump in funding
for activities related to waste acceptance, storage, and transportation
in anticipation of the repository accepting waste by 2010.
Environmental Management
The Office of Environmental Management (EM) is responsible for managing
the cleanup of the environmental legacy of the nation's nuclear weapons
program -- everything from research to testing to production. The
total EM request comes to $7.4 billion, a 4.1% increase from the comparable
FY 2004 budget request. The budget request states that this level
of funding should provide the resources for EM to work towards its
goal to complete cleanup of 89 of the 114 sites by the end of 2006.
Geothermal
Geothermal technology funded under the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy (EERE) is marked for an increase of 1% from last
year's request, to total $25.8 million. Again, research related to
hydrogen has won out over the established programs within this account.
In total, EERE has requested $374 million, an increase of 1.2% from
last year's request.
More details on the overall DOE budget request can be found at http://www.mbe.doe.gov/budget/05budget/index.htm.
On June 25th the House approved the FY05 Energy and Water Appropriations
Bill, allocating $28 billion for the Department of Energy. This amount
is $49 million above the President's request and $735 million above
the FY04 enacted level, with the majority of this increase directed
toward the Army Corps of Engineers.
Under the Energy Supply account, Renewable Energy Resources was allocated
$343 million, a 7% decrease from the FY04 enacted amount of $370 million
and an 8% decrease from the President's request of $374 million. Included
in this category is Geothermal Technology Development and Hydropower.
For geothermal technology, the Committee provided the $25.8 million
that the president requested and directed DOE to maintain university
research funding at FY04 levels. $5 million was recommended for hydropower,
$1 million less than requested by the President but $100,000 more
than last year's allocation. DOE was directed to focus on completing
a limited program involving new turbine technologies and then transfer
them for deployment. Any research for advanced hydropower technology
should not be funded by DOE, but rather the agencies that own and
operate the Federal hydropower facilities.
Non-Defense Site Acceleration Completion was allocated $151.8 million
by the Committee, identical to the President's request and $11.2 million
shy of the FY04 enacted level. $500 million was recommended by the
Committee for the Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning
Fund, which is a 17% increase over the FY04 enacted level. Non-Defense
Environmental Services was also funded at the President's requested
level of $291.3 million, but was still $14.7 million short of FY04
funding. In the category of Defense Environmental Management, the
Committee recommended $6.9 billion, a reduction of $63 million from
the President's request and a $263 million increase from FY04. Of
this $6.9 billion, $5.9 billion was directed toward Defense Site Acceleration
Completion, whose funding increased 6% from the FY04 level of $5.6
billion. Defense Environmental Services was allocated $958 million,
a 5% decrease from the FY04 enacted level. In response to a 2003 Idaho
Federal district court decision that stated the DOE does not have
the authority to reclassify high level nuclear waste, the cleanup
sites at Savannah River and Idaho will not be funded in FY05 while
the DOE seeks to overturn the court's decision.
The Committee recommended a 6% increase for Basic Energy Sciences,
giving this category a total of $1.08 billion compared to FY04 level
of $1 billion. This amount was also $13 million more than the $1.06
billion requested by the President. $232 million was recommended for
the chemical sciences, geosciences, and energy biosciences research.
Funding for the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository was recommended
at $131 million from the Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal category,
with none of the requested $749 million recommended for the Nuclear
Waste Disposal category. DOE originally requested $880 million from
these two categories but assumed that $749 million would come from
legislation that would allow the reclassification of fees paid into
the Nuclear Waste Fund to be used to fund the Nuclear Waste Disposal
portion of the bill. Even with limited funding, the Committee directed
DOE to keep the project on schedule for licensing in December. If
the reclassification legislation does not pass, however, Yucca Mountain
will be seriously under funded for FY05, delaying the project from
its expected 2010 opening date.
The Committee once again did not provide any funds for the National
Climate Change Technology Initiative (NCCTI), claiming a plethora
of other DOE research related to this topic rendered funding it unnecessary.
The Senate never took a vote on this bill in subcommittee, full committee
or on the Floor. The first time Senators voted on funding for the
Energy and Water Appropriations bill was when they voted on the omnibus
spending bill on November 20th. See Consolidated Appropriations (below).
|
Consolidated
Appropriations Bill
|
Once again, Congress failed to pass all thirteen appropriations bills
by the September 30th deadline and opted to pass two continuing resolutions,
funding all federal agencies at FY04 levels until December 3. Congress
came back into lame duck session on November 16th with the omnibus
appropriations legislation first on the agenda. When all the dust
settled, Congress agreed on the massive 3000 page $388 billion spending
bill H.R.
4818 for FY05. The bill, which was crafted under the mantra of
fiscal restraint, employed a 0.8% across-the-board cut to reign in
spending. This is reflected in the FY05 Enacted column of the chart
above.
Overall, the Department of Energy was mostly flat funded for FY05
with total funding allocated at $23.1 billion. The Renewable Energy
Resources account will receive a 3.4% increase to $383 million. Hydropower
and Geothermal Technology Development were both flat funded at $4.9
million and $25.5 million respectively. The report states, "Geopowering
the West is funded at current year levels. The Department is directed
to maintain funding for university research at the fiscal year 2004
funding level. The conference agreement includes $500,000 for the
Full Circle Project in Lake County, California; $1,000,000 for geothermal
research at the University of Nevada-Reno; $500,000 for the Tuscarora
Geothermal Project; $300,000 for the Klamath and Lake Counties Geothermal-Agricultural
Industrial Park in Oregon; $750,000 for the Geothermal Mill Redevelopment
project in Massachusetts; and $196,000 for the University of Texas
Permian Basin Center for Energy and Economic Diversification for geothermal
research."
Non-Defense Site Acceleration Completion received $150 million, 8%
less than in FY04. Non-Defense Environmental Services took a 6% cut
to $287 million. Defense Environmental Management enjoyed a 4.5% increase
to $6.94 billion. Defense Site Acceleration Completion also benefited
from a 7.2% increase to $6 billion. Defense Environmental Services
suffered an 8.6% cut to $924 million. Basic Energy Services got an
8.6% increase to $1.1 billion. Chemical, Geosciences, and Energy Biosciences
received a 12.7% increase to $251 million.
Nuclear Waste Disposal's 45% increase to $343 million was mostly
offset by Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal's 41% cut to $229 million.
Together, the $573 million will fund the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste
Repository. Since this number is $307 million less than requested
by the President, the prospect of Yucca Mountain opening by 2010 is
in doubt.
The Conference declined to fund the National Climate Change Technology
Initiative.
Sources: Department of Energy website; White House Office of Management
and Budget; United States Senate website; U.S. House of Representatives
website; THOMAS legislative database; American Institute of Physicists.
Please send any comments or requests for information to the AGI
Government Affairs Program.
Contributed by Emily M. Lehr, AGI Government Affairs Program Staff;
Gayle Levy, AGI/AAPG 2004 Spring Semester Intern; and Ashlee Dere,
AGI/AAPG 2004 Summer Intern, and David Millar 2004 AGI/AAPG Fall Semester
Intern
Last Update November 29, 2004
|