AGI Home | About AGIContact UsSearch 

Printable Version

Energy Policy (3-08-10)

Untitled Document





Energy policy incorporates a wide range of issues. Many of which are important to the geoscience community, including exploration and discovery, research and development related to fossil fuels and alternative energy resources, resource development on public lands, environmental concerns, and climate change. Nuclear energy, nuclear waste disposal and non-proliferation issues are also key issues in energy policy. However, due to their complexity, the AGI Government Affairs Program maintains a separate page for nuclear policy. Policymakers are working to better integrate policy for all forms of energy resources. The 111th Congress and the new Administration will continue to consider energy policy as a major area of concern, and essential for economic growth, national security, international relations, energy efficiency, sustainability, and overall quality of life. Besides working on comprehensive energy policy, policymakers will also continue on policy from the 110th Congress tackling how to best meet the energy needs of Americans while considering other natural resources, such as the global climate, water, soils and ecosystems.

Recent Action

House Committee Seeks Information on Fluids Used in Hydraulic Fracturing(2/10)
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Subcommittee Chairman Edward Markey (D-MA), have sent additional letters to eight oil and gas companies requesting more information about the chemicals they use in their hydraulic fracturing fluids. Hydraulic fracturing took center stage at a hearing last summer, as it has the potential to unlock large natural gas reserves in U.S. shale beds. There are concerns that increased use of chemical-based fluids during hydraulic fracturing may contaminate local water sources and harm the environment.

The chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing are not regulated, however there is a voluntary agreement between Halliburton, BJ Services and Schlumberger Technology Corporation with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) restricting use of diesel-based fluids. After the first letter writing campaign by Waxman, Halliburton and BJ Services responded that 807,000 and 2,500 gallons respectively of diesel-based fluids were used in their fracturing ventures—potentially violating the EPA agreement. In the most recent letters, Halliburton and BJ services received requests for more chemical information, as did Schlumberger Technology Corporation and many smaller companies. Copies of the letters are available here.

Obama Announces an Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage (2/10)
On February 3, 2010 President Obama called for an Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) to define a coordinated federal strategy to fast-track the development of clean coal technologies. The 14-member task force will be comprised of a senior officials designated to represent their respective cabinet level offices or executive office of the president. It will be co-chaired by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency representatives.

The task force will be named within 180 days of this announcement and then begin developing a comprehensive plan to develop cost-effective CCS within 10 years, with 5-10 commercial demonstration projects online by 2016.  The task force will look at coordinating existing administrative authorities and programs, including building international collaboration on CCS. Obama named comprehensive energy and climate legislation as the largest incentive for CCS, and this task force will prepare for the low carbon energy transition and spur investments into CCS in the near future.

Back to top

Previous Action

Interior Launches Oil and Gas Leasing Reforms (1/10)
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced reforms to oil and gas leasing sales on public lands. Key changes include interdisciplinary reviews that consider site-specific concerns, greater public involvement in the Master Leasing and Development plans and BLM will take a lead role in determining areas where leasing can occur.

The full press release is available from DOI.

House Passes Energy and Water Research Bill (12/09)
The Energy and Water Research Integration Act (H.R. 3598) passed out of the House on December 1, 2009. The bill addresses the nexus between energy and water resource demands by directing the Secretary of Energy to take water into consideration. The Secretary of Energy must work to advance energy technologies to become more water efficient, consider the implications of climate change on water supplies for energy, estimate the water needed for energy production, and understand the energy required to provide water to the public. It creates an Energy-Water Architecture Council to work on improving energy and water resources data and advance technological innovations. The Energy Department will take the lead, but work in coordination with other federal agencies. 

The bill has now goes to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee for consideration.

DOE Announces $366 Million for 3 Energy Innovation Hubs (12/09) The Department of Energy (DOE) plans to invest up to $366 million to establish and operate three new Energy Innovation Hubs focused on: 1) fuels from sunlight, 2) energy efficient building design, and 3) computer modeling and simulation of advanced nuclear reactors. Each hub will receive $22 million the first year and up to $25 million per year for the following four years. The goal is for a multidisciplinary team of researchers to conduct high-risk research in a single area to accelerate research and commercial deployment of highly promising energy-related technologies.

“The DOE Energy Innovation Hubs represent a new, more proactive approach to managing and conducting research. We are taking a page from America’s great industrial laboratories in their heyday,” said Energy Secretary Steven Chu. The centralized and focused hubs will be complemented by the Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) and Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E). The EFRCs work on collaborations to make an easier transition from basic science research to game-changing discoveries. ARPA-E funds diverse research with the potential for high reward that would otherwise be too risky for industry or other programs to fund.

Originally Chu wanted eight hubs, but Congress felt they were too redundant and only allocated money for one. However, Chu shuffled existing money around to ultimately fund these three, though at a reduced starting budget from the orignial $35 million.

Information on the implementation plan and strategy for managing the hubs is on the DOE Energy Innovation Hubs web site: http://hubs.energy.gov

International Report on Energy Outlook (11/09)
The International Energy Agency’s (IEA) World Energy Outlook report gives projections concerning the world’s energy needs and the changing climate. The report estimates that from 2010 to 2030 about $26 trillion will be needed for energy development globally and an additional $10.5 trillion will be needed for energy technologies and efficiency in order to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to about 450 parts per million (ppm) and avoid catastrophic climate change. More than half of the emissions reductions by 2030 will be from improved energy efficiency with the rest from renewables and biofuels, nuclear power, hybrid and electric vehicles and carbon capture and sequestration. Efficiency will lead to global savings of about $8.6 trillion in transport, buildings and industry costs.

Within the IEA scenario, demand for fossil fuels is projected to peak in 2020, however, fossil fuels will still contribute about 70 percent of global energy in 2030. The financial crisis reduced oil demand in 2009, but also led to a $90 billion cut in investments in oil and gas exploration and development. This may lead to fewer supplies to meet growing demand and thus higher prices in the future. Natural gas is predicted to play a significant role in transitioning to a low-carbon energy economy. The huge boost in North American unconventional gas discoveries and production (primarily oil shale) makes natural gas a “transition fuel” to a clean energy economy in this world outlook.

DOE Awards $151 Million in First Round of ARPA-E Projects (11/09)
The Advance Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) has awarded a total of $151 million to 37 projects in its first round of proposals. The awards go to researchers in 17 states, and a variety of sectors. Most awards went to small businesses and academic institutions (43 percent and 35 percent respectively), and 19 percent went to large corporations. These projects focus on high risk, high reward breakthroughs to fundamentally change the energy sector in all fields from biofuels to carbon capture. Proposals include advanced battery science for large-scale energy storage to allow “round-the-clock” electricity from wind or solar power sources, and synthetic enzymes to trump the current amine and ammonia based carbon capture process at power plants with a cheaper, easier method.

In response to the original call for ARPA-E proposals in April, about 3,600 concept papers were submitted. Of those, ARPA-E requested full applications for 300 proposals and ultimately selected 37 for funding. This first round is only a portion of the $400 million President Obama announced for ARPA-E as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or “stimulus” funds. A second round of proposal solicitations will begin soon, but no timelines have been announced yet.

For more information and a full list of the awards, please visit the ARPA-E website.

EESI Briefing on Human Behavior and Energy Use (11/09)
The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) held a briefing November 18, 2009 on Human Behavior and Energy Use in conjunction with the Behavior, Energy, and Climate Change (BCEE) Conference. The panelists stressed that energy efficiency is as reliant on changing human attitude and behavior as technological advances. The briefing examined how and why people choose to use or ignore energy efficiency technologies.

Representative Brian Baird (D-WA) deemed the quickest and easiest fix to energy use to be changing human behavior, calling a 20 percent reduction in 20 weeks completely attainable. Doug McKenzie-Mohr, a psychology professor and founder of Community-Based Social Marketing, talked of the misconceptions in human behavior. McKenzie-Mohr said people are not solely driven by economic self-interest. He recommended tackling behavior changes which have a higher probability of participation even if they have less of an overall reduction in energy usage. Gene Rodrigues, Director of Energy Efficiency for Southern California Edison, agreed saying it was all about engagement. Southern California has such successful energy efficiency programs because they have an engaged public.

Richard Andres, Energy Chair for the National Defense University, showed that the military is making “energy culture” part of their energy strategies. They see being greener as a money-saver, a life-saver, and something that will be passed onto civilians and help change the entire U.S. energy culture. Karen Ehrhardt-Martinez, chair of the BCEE Conference, pointed out that people really want to conserve energy, they just need some help in achieving their goals, keeping in mind that there are many different motivators to get people to change behavior.

EESI Creating Jobs in Appalachia Briefing (10/09)
The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) held a briefing on “Creating Jobs in Appalachia through Investments in Energy Efficiency.” The briefing focused on a report commissioned by the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) entitled “Energy Efficiency in Appalachia: How Much More is Available, at What Cost, and By When” (PDF). The speakers included Anne B. Pope, Federal Co-Chair of the ARC; Ben Taube, Executive Director of the Southeast Energy Efficiency Alliance; Ryan Unger, Special Assistant to the Executive Director of SEDA-Council of Governments; and Jen Worth, Program Manager of the Center for Workforce and Economic Development with the American Association of Community Colleges.

Pope, Taube, and Unger spoke about the money saved and jobs created by taking energy efficiency into consideration. The EIA projects energy consumption to grow by 28 percent by 2030 in the Appalachian Region, which is much higher than the 19 percent projection for the U.S. average. The report found that an energy efficiency initiation could potentially create over 77,000 jobs as well as reduce energy consumption in the region “by up to 24 percent by the year 2030.” Pope said the ARC is interested in energy for economic development and “not for energy’s sake.”

Worth talked about the green efforts at community colleges. She said that every community college is improving the energy efficiency of their campuses, making sustainability part of their curriculum, and “expanding industry and workforce partnerships to rapidly train much of the nation’s “greening” workforce.”

New DOE Plan for Clean Energy Loans (10/09)
Steven Chu announced the Department of Energy’s (DOE) plan to administer up to $750 million of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds to be used towards accelerating the development of renewable energy projects. The funding is intended to cover loan guarantee costs, which could assist in lending between $4 billion and $8 billion to appropriate projects.

To help with this, DOE has created a new loan guarantee program called Financial Institution Partnership Program (FIPP). According to DOE, the goal of FIPP is to “leverage the human and financial capital of private sector financial institutions by accelerating the loan application process while balancing risk between DOE and private sector partners participating in the program.”

State Surveys Get $17.79 Million in DOE Geothermal Grants (10/09)
Energy Secretary Steven Chu dedicated up to $338 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (or stimulus) funds for geothermal research, exploration and development grants. In addition, Chu announced that a coalition of 40 state geological surveys led by the Arizona Geological Survey (AZGS) will gather state-specific data for the new National Geothermal Data System (NGDS) using the Geoscience Information Network (GIN). The GIN is a program between the Association of American State Geologists (AASG) and the U.S. Geological Survey to integrate geological databases into an accessible, online format.

In the grant announcements, AZGS will receive $17.79 million of the funds over three years on behalf of the coalition to populate the NGDS. Most of the other projects announced are also expected to contribute their data to the NGDS.

For more information on the announcement and projects funded, read the press release on the DOE website.

DOI Releases Review of Oil and Gas Leases in Utah (10/09)
A Department of the Interior (DOI) review team recommends opening 17 of the 77 leasing sites withdrawn after their last minute sale in the final weeks of the Bush Administration. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has pledged to uphold the recommendations, and use them as a starting point to overhaul the Bureau of Land Management oil and gas leasing programs. Of the remaining 60 parcels, 8 will be withdrawn and 52 are under further review.

In January, a temporary injunction was issued by a federal district court against the 77 sites in Utah after environmental groups challenged the sales. Many of the sites are located near national parks, or other sensitive lands. In February, DOI withdrew the leases and ordered a thorough review of the sites. 

Measure Proposes a New Oil and Gas Leasing Agency (10/09)
The Minerals Management Service Reform Act (H.R. 3736) has been introduced by Government Reform Committee Ranking Member Darrell Issa (R-CA) to remove the Minerals Management Service (MMS) from the Department of the Interior (DOI) and make it an independent agency. MMS, which oversees oil and gas royalty payments, would become an independent federal agency with a director appointed by the President. Issa argues that this will allow for more effective oversight by Congress.

House Natural Resources Chairman Nick Rahall (D-WV) disagrees and introduced a bill of his own (H.R. 3534) that would consolidate the energy programs of both the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and MMS into one office at DOI in charge of onshore and offshore oil and gas leasing. Rahall says this bill will also give more authority to DOI’s inspector general.

Secretary Ken Salazar agrees that an office is needed within DOI to collaborate between BLM and MMS, but it is yet to be seen how to best set up and carry this out.

House Bill Aims to Provide $250M for Clean Tech Start Ups (10/09)
Representative Glen Nye (D-VA) introduced the Small Business Early-Stage Investment Act of 2009 (H.R. 3738) to allocate $250 million for a Small Business Administration program designed to provide grants to small and early stage companies in clean technology.

Despite the growth in interest for clean technology, lending in the sector has been hit hard by the recession. Studies show that investment fell by over half throughout the past year. Proponents of the bill noted the potential economic benefit to be unleashed by the investment.

The funds will be administered through established venture capital firms. This system was commended by supporters in business and government for the potential efficient and effective investment that can be made by professionals. The strict stipulations of the bill, however, may prove to be an issue in the venture capital community. A mandate to spend the fund within five years may be too quick as many capital venture funds last 10 or more years. The stipulations for experience and fund success could also prevent talent laden young firms from participating in the program.

Solar R&D Bill Passes House (10/09)
The Solar Roadmap Technology Act (H.R. 3585), introduced by Representative Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in the House Science and Technology Committee, passed the House on October 22 and awaits approval in the Senate. The bill would allocate $2.25 billion from fiscal years 2010 to 2015 for solar research and development projects. It also would create a “Solar Technology Roadmap Committee” of Department of Energy (DOE) appointed experts, a third of which will be solar industry representatives. It also mandates that by 2012, 30 percent of the DOE funding for solar research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) is consistent with the roadmap recommendations, and is ramped up to 75 percent by 2015. Energy Secretary Steven Chu will be in charge of awarding grants to carry out the solar programs and providing awards to industry for solar manufacturing RD&D.

EESI “Zero Energy” Homes Briefing (10/09)
The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) and Representative Bart Gordon (D-TN) held a hearing on “‘Zero Energy’ Homes: Here Now.” About 40 percent of the country’s energy is consumed by buildings. With much concern surrounding climate and energy legislation and the projected rise in price of energy bills, this briefing was held to show that the technologies needed to build energy efficient homes are available. To reinforce that point, zero energy homes were on display near the Capitol as part of the Department of Energy’s Solar Decathlon in October. The speakers included Cathy Zio, Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy for the U.S. Department of Energy; Richard King, Director of the Solar Decathlon; Donald Colliver, Solar Decathlon Project Leader and Professor at the University of Kentucky; Erin Poch, Director of Business Development at Roofing Resources, Inc.; and John Stanton, Associate of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA)

Zio, King, and Colliver gave talks about the Solar Decathlon. The goal of the Decathlon is to build “attractive, fully functional 800 square-foot homes…that operate completely and independently on the electric grid.” King said the decathlon not only educates students, but also professionals, builders, and architects. Colliver stated that the objectives of the Decathlon are to demonstrate that net-zero energy homes are not only possible, but feasible, and that these houses can be marketable. He called the experience of being a project leader the “most exciting opportunity in [his] 30 years of teaching.”

Poch and Stanton talked about ways that someone could cheaply improve the efficiency of an already existing building. Poch suggested the addition of a bio-based cool roof system, low-height insulations, and liquid thermal barriers. Stanton said that solar technologies are becoming more and more affordable as the rate of manufacturing increases. He added that since last year, the production of solar panels have increased by 80 percent and that the prices have gone down by 50 percent.

Forum on the Perils of Energy Sprawl (10/09)
Resources For the Future held a policy leadership forum entitled “The Perils of Energy Sprawl.” Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN), a member of the Senate’s Environment and Public Works Committee and Chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, discussed the current movement towards renewable energy. He proposed that this movement could threaten the nations habitats, landscapes, and land.

Alexander spoke of the Nature Conservancy paper titled, “Energy Sprawl or Energy Efficiency: Climate Policy Impacts on Natural Habitat for the United States of America” (PDF). The paper warns that production of renewable energies such as wind power, biofuels, and solar could potentially require a landmass larger than Nebraska. It recommends four ways for policymakers to approach this problem: 1) concentrate on energy conservation, 2) place renewable energy technologies in already developed sites to decrease energy sprawl, 3) make carbon regulation flexible for coal and nuclear plants, and 4) give thought to the site selection of the energy projects.

Alexander gave suggestions on how the country can reach its carbon goals with the least environmental damage. Alexander urged that the country rethink nuclear power, calling it the most compact form of renewable energy. He advised that the U.S. should, over the next 20 years, build 100 nuclear power plants as well as electrifying half of the cars and trucks being driven. He also recommended the placement of solar panels on rooftops in order to use already developed space. Alexander ended his speech by referring to Al Gore's documentary "An Inconvenient Truth", calling nuclear power the “inconvenient solution” to an “inconvenient problem.”

The transcript for Senator Alexander’s speech can be found here.

Competing Energy Bills Emerge in the House (9/09)
Representatives Tim Murphy (R-PA) and Nick Rahall (D-WV) have introduced competing energy bills to overhaul onshore and offshore energy leases and revenue systems. Hearings were held in September on Murphy’s American Conservation and Clean Energy Independence Act (H.R. 2227) and Rahall’s Consolidated Land, Energy, and Aquatic Resources Act of 2009, or CLEAR Act, (H.R. 3534).

The CLEAR Act would create a new Department of the Interior (DOI) agency to govern oil and gas leasing on federal lands, a task currently split between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Minerals Management Service (MMS). It would pressure industry to quickly develop their leases and would add new fees. It also makes changes to offshore development rules, includes a commercial wind and solar leasing program, and boosts funding for ocean conservation and land acquisition

H.R. 2227 is a bipartisan bill with wide support from Republicans and conservative Democrats in the House. It includes the Bush Administration plan for the outer continental shelf, which expands leasing into areas off all coasts. The revenue from offshore production, which Murphy estimates to increase to at least $2 trillion with the expanded area, would be distributed to states and various reserves. The reserves include a renewable energy fund to promote alternative energy development, an environmental restoration reserve, and a clean coal and carbon capture technology fund.

The CLEAR Act, while garnering some support, has many industry groups concerned about the proposed fee increases and environmentalists worried about a disconnect between the proposed leasing office and the land management side. Some moderates prefer the provisions in H.R. 2227, but have not expressly opposed the CLEAR Act.

House Passes Wind Energy and Advanced Vehicles Bill (9/09)
The Wind Energy Research and Development Act (H.R. 3165), which passed the House this month, would provide $1 billion over five years for research into wind energy generation. This includes materials and turbine design, offshore applications, and reliability improvement. The bill’s sponsor, Congressman Paul Tonko, (R-NY), extolled the potential for wind in the U.S. and described this bill as bringing the country closer to realizing that full potential.

With a vote of 312-114, the House passed the Advanced Vehicle Technology Act (H.R. 3246) to provide $3 billion over five years for research and development of advanced vehicle technologies. Most of the prescribed technology is fuel efficiency and energy related. Approved amendments included adding recreational vehicles and farm equipment, public-private partnerships, reporting requirements, and expand the scope of technologies. The rejected amendment, proposed by Representative Paul Broun (R-GA), would have cut the bill by $700 million. Broun argued that existing funding programs are addressing these needs. Despite the bill’s cost, House Science and Technology Committee Chair Bart Gordon (D-TN) said it would aid in stimulating the economy and developing the next generation of vehicles.

DOI to Eliminate Royalty-in-Kind Program (9/09)
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar cancelled the royalty-in-kind program, saying that in his view, the program has been “a blemish” on the department. The program allowed industry to bypass cash royalty payments by providing oil and gas directly to the Department of the Interior (DOI) instead. DOI reported last year that nearly a third of the royalty-in-kind program staff was receiving gifts and gratuities from oil and gas companies doing business with the agency. Representative Nick Rahall (D-WV) accused the employees of “cozying up with industry officials” rather than getting fair returns for taxpayers. Rahall was pleased with Salazar’s announcement, having recently introduced his own bill (H.R. 3534) to give the federal royalty system a make over, including termination of the royalty-in-kind program.

The American Petroleum Institute is opposed to terminating the royalty-in-kind program because they think the program is cost-effective and reduced paperwork. The DOI’s Minerals Management Service has expressed similar views, saying the program simplifies royalty collections, keeps down administrative costs, and curtails conflicts with energy companies. Regardless, Salazar said a secretarial order to end the royalty-in-kind program will be issued within the next few weeks.

UN Estimates Cost for Renewables in Developing World (9/09)
The 2009 World Economic and Social Survey “Promoting Development, Saving the Planet” issued by the United Nations (UN) in September estimates the cost of converting the world’s developing nations to renewable sources of energy will be between $500 and $600 billion a year for the next ten years. The total investment would represent around one percent of global GDP annually. This is a revised estimate and is much higher than an earlier estimate of about $100 billion.

The report recommends a “Global Sustainable New Deal”, modeled on the one that drove the U.S. out of the Great Depression. This “New Deal”, according to the report, will require large-scale investment that will not easily be supported by developing nations. Funding will likely come largely from public funding, like a global investment program, in conjunction with partnerships, incentives, and innovative financing options. Another important requirement is the transfer of key renewable energy technology from those nations possessing the scientific and technical capital to help less developed nations. These recommendations are founded on the disproportionate degree to which developing nations will be exposed to the potential hazards of climate change.

The report was assembled by the Department of Social and Economic Affairs of the UN Secretariat, and is published annually. The report argues that the combined management of climate change adaptation and planned economic development in developing regions will improve the environment as well as the economic outlook and stability of developing countries.

The responsibility of developed and developing nations to address climate change will be discussed this December at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. This report will provide some basis for discussing the costs of developing a new climate change treaty to follow the Kyoto Protocol.

The survey is available here.

Algae-Based Biofuels Gain Congressional Favor (8/09)
Interested in the benefits of algae as a biofuel, Representatives Brian Bilbray (R-CA), Jay Inslee (D-WA), and Harry Teague (D-NM) have introduced a bill (H.R. 3460) to include algae-based fuels in the renewable fuels standard (RFS) and cellulosic biofuels tax credit. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 currently limits corn-based ethanol production to 15 billion gallons a year by 2015 and has 21 billion gallons of renewable fuels coming from advanced biofuels, which includes cellulosic biofuels and biodiesel. However, there is no specific inclusion of algae-based biofuels. The Senate has not introduced any similar bills. Senate Energy and Natural Resource Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) has called the RFS too restrictive and fellow New Mexico Senator Tom Udall (D) is a strong proponent of algae-based fuels, so companion legislation may come soon.

Congress’ interest is sparked by investment in algae-based biofuels by industry giants, small start-ups, and Native American tribes. This year, Exxon Mobil and Dow Chemical announced investments in algae-based biofuels, and a frenzy of smaller companies have demonstration projects across the country. The Southern Ute tribe in Colorado is contributing about one third of the capital and free use of their natural gas rich land to partner with Solix Biofuels. Solix proposes using the waste streams from natural gas processing plants to grow algae for fuel. The growing algae trend will likely makes its way into the energy bill discussions this fall.

NY Times article on the Southern Ute tribe algae investment:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/17/business/energy-environment/17algae.html

Funds Announced for Energy Frontier Research Centers (8/09)
The Department of Energy (DOE) announced on August 6 that $377 million will be used to establish 46 new Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRCs). The new EFRCs are located within 31 universities, 12 national laboratories, 2 nonprofit organizations, and one corporate research center that were selected as part of an extensive merit-based review process. The objective of these centers is to facilitate and accelerate the U.S. transition to a clean energy economy by producing the necessary scientific breakthroughs.

The EFRCs will work on advances in renewable energy, transportation, energy efficiency, electricity storage and transmission, clean coal and carbon capture and sequestration, and nuclear energy. These centers are part of Energy Secretary Steven Chu’s plan to spur innovation that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and lessen U.S. reliance on foreign oil. Funding for these centers comes mostly from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, but $100 million is from the DOE fiscal year 2009 budget.

DOI Fast Tracks Renewables on Public Land (8/09)
The Department of the Interior (DOI) is trying to quickly expand renewable energy development on federal lands by designating more than 670,000 acres for Solar Energy Study Areas. These study areas are located in six western states and will be evaluated for environmental impacts and resource suitability for utility-scale solar energy development. The study areas will be segregated from other mineral resource development to allow the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to complete the environmental reviews and establish acceptable development zones by the end of 2010. DOI hopes to have 13 commercial-scale solar plants under construction by the end of next year. DOI is also setting up new solar energy permitting offices to facilitate permitting for companies that have already applied for solar projects inside and outside of the study areas.

Large-scale solar energy projects may not move as quickly as DOI hopes, as concerns over the impacts arise. Environmental and conservation groups are worried that the large projects and the long transmission lines needed to connect the power plants to the urban areas will destroy endangered species’ habitats. Industry is also concerned about developing in the rain parched west, where getting water rights to cool their systems may be difficult. DOI does not have similar study zones planned for wind or geothermal.

IEA Warns Of "Oil Crunch" in Next 5 Years (8/09)
The chief economist, Fatih Birol, of the International Energy Agency (IEA) declared that a devastating “oil crunch” will occur in the next five years because most of the major oil fields are past their peak production. Birol warned that global oil production will peak in 10 years, which is sooner than predicted because the decrease in oil production is occurring twice as fast as projected. Birol stated that oil prices will be higher because the supply will not increase with demand.

The comments were made on June 29, 2009 after the IEA released an update to its medium-term forecast for oil demand. The IEA is comprised of energy experts from its 28 member countries and conducts energy research as well as advises the 28 countries on energy policy. The organization focuses on the “Three E’s”, energy security, economic development, and environmental protection.

More details about the IEA’s medium-term oil forecast are available here.

FutureGen to Proceed to Design Stage (7/09)
On July 14, 2009 the Department of Energy (DOE) formally announced its intentions to proceed with planning for the FutureGen Project in Mattoon, IL. The project is a non-profit industrial consortium led by the coal-fired electric power industry and the coal production industry to plan, design, construct and operate a coal gasification power plant integrated with carbon capture and sequestration. The plant will be capable of capturing 90 percent of the carbon dioxide released, but may only operate at 60 percent capacity for the first few years. The project will also limit emissions of other pollutants and include an option for a research platform to support development of technologies for future power plants that capture and sequester carbon dioxide.

In June 2008, President Bush discontinued support for the project. Since then DOE has reassessed that decision and reached an agreement to complete a preliminary design, a revised cost estimate and a funding plan. This announcement does not commit DOE to any actual construction yet. If the plans are approved, DOE will contribute $1 billion from stimulus funds with an additional $1.4 billion coming from the FutureGen consortium, revenues from electricity sales, and other sources yet to be identified.

More information about FutureGen is available at http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/futuregen/

DOE Begins Looking at ARPA-E Proposals (7/09)
The Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) of the Department of Energy (DOE) has completed the submission stage of its first Funding Opportunity Announcement. ARPA-E will focus on high risk, high pay-off technologies that lead to energy transformations. Its aims to maintain U.S. economic security by identifying technologies with the potential to reduce energy imports from foreign sources, reduce energy-related greenhouse gas emissions, and improve energy efficiency while keeping the U.S. as the technological leader in the world.

ARPA-E has received about 3,500 concept papers for the $150 million available from the stimulus package passed earlier this year. The number of concepts exceeded industry expectations and demonstrates the large capacity for energy innovation in the nation. ARPA-E will notify those who submitted concept papers by July 28, 2009 if they think the concepts are feasible and the applicant should proceed. Full proposals are due by August 28, 2009. ARPA-E is planning to offer further solicitations in the future.

For more information please visit the ARPA-E website at: http://arpa-e.energy.gov/

Court Clarifies Ruling On Offshore Drilling (7/09)
On July 29, 2009 the Department of the Interior (DOI) issued a press statement indicating it will proceed with the offshore oil lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico on August 19. This decision comes one day after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit clarified that its prior ruling to vacate the 2007-2012 Outer Continental Shelf oil and natural gas leasing program applies only to the Chukchi, Beaufort and Bering Seas around Alaska. The court vacated this part of the program because the Bush Administration did not conduct sufficient scientific and environmental analysis before scheduling the leasing.

Leasing in the Gulf of Mexico and other areas will proceed according to the five year leasing plan, while the DOI will work to fix the problems with the offshore leasing around Alaska. The DOI will provide periodic updates on their progress to ensure sufficient scientific and environmental analysis for potential offshore leasing in the Chukchi, Beaufort and Bering Seas.

Hydraulic Fracturing Debated In Congress (7/09)
Congress is debating whether hydraulic fracturing should be monitored under the Safe Water Drinking Act. In the Energy Policy Act of 2005, hydraulic fracturing was removed from the oversight of the Safe Water Drinking Act. Bills in the House (H.R. 2766) and the Senate (S. 1215) would repeal this exemption. According to an HIS Global Insight study released by the American Petroleum Institute (API), between $84 and $374 billion in gross domestic product (GDP) losses would occur by 2014 if there was increased regulation or total elimination of hydraulic fracturing. The study also found that an increase in unemployment and foreign imports would follow.

Hydraulic fracturing has been used by the industry for over 50 years to aid in drilling for difficult to recover gas reserves. Some say the chemicals mixed with the sand and water to break up the rocks are harmful to groundwater. After Congress was assured the process was safe, it was removed from the Drinking Water Act. Since then several contaminated sites have been found near gas wells, but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) now has limited authority to investigate. Congress wants to reinstate EPA authority and held hearings to assess the situation, while industry references studies showing that state oversight is sufficient and federal regulations will only hamper exploration. 

The PDF of the API study is available here:
http://api.org/policy/exploration/hydraulicfracturing/upload/IHS-GI-Hydraulic-Fracturing-Natl-impacts.pdf
Information on the Safe Water Drinking Act is available from EPA:
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/sdwa/index.html
The full text of H.R. 2766 is available from Thomas:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.02766:
The full text of S. 1215 is available from Thomas:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:SN01215:

Senate Introduces Offshore Revenue Sharing (7/09)
The Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) drilling debate continues as strong advocates of increased offshore drilling develop a coastal states revenue sharing bill. Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Mary Landrieu (D-LA) introduced the Domestic Energy Security Act of 2009 (S. 1517), which would direct 37.5 percent of revenue generated by offshore oil and gas development to those coastal states and 12.5 percent to the Land and Water Conservation Fund. The bill would provide incentives for these states to contribute to the “energy bridge” between foreign oil and new energy sources. Landrieu’s argument is that all revenues currently go to the federal treasury, bypassing the states which deal with the risks and responsibilities of OCS development.

Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) argued against revenue sharing, pointing out that the OCS is a federal resource. Murkowski’s staff indicated she will try and add this bill as an amendment to the climate and energy legislation moving through the Senate. If energy and climate change are combined into one comprehensive bill this amendment could draw some offshore drilling supporters, but is likely insufficient to sway staunch opponents to the climate change bill. Murkowski has urged that energy be considered separately from climate legislation, despite the two being merged in the House bill.

The debate resumed this year after last summer’s high gas prices and lapse in the OCS drilling ban. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar is still working to develop his OCS policies for the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska after Congress let the 18 year moratoria expire. Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) has already tried to add language to widen the OCS leasing areas in the Senate energy bill, causing tension with Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL). S. 1517 includes similar widening language along with the revenue sharing plan.

The full text of S. 1517 is available from Thomas: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:s1517:

House Committee Approved Four Energy R&D Bills (7/09)
On July 29, 2009, the House Science and Technology Committee approved four bills that would establish energy research and development (R&D) programs within the Department of Energy (DOE). The first bill (H.R. 3246) would provide funding for R&D of advanced vehicles, such as electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cells, to reduce petroleum fuel use and gasoline emissions. The second bill (H.R. 3165) would fund wind energy R&D in order to create lighter, larger and cheaper wind turbine blades and advanced sensors for better performance and reliability. Research of offshore wind energy applications and a collaborative wind energy demonstration program between DOE and industry would also be authorized. The third bill (H.R. 3029) would establish a research, development, and technology demonstration program for natural gas turbines with the goal of achieving combined cycle efficiency of 65 percent. The last bill (H.R. 3247) would establish a social and behavioral science research program in DOE to better understand the societal factors that influence energy consumption.

The full text of each of the four bills can be found on Thomas at:
H.R 3246: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.3246:
H.R 3165: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.3165:
H.R 3029: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.3029:
H.R 3247: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.3247:

The New Energy Economy and Energy Storage Briefing (7/09)
On July 16, 2009, a briefing on the status of energy storage technology was held by the National Science Foundation, Discover Magazine, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., and American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Corey S. Powell, the Editor in chief of Discover, moderated the meeting. Dr. Daniel Nocera and Ralph Masiello spoke on their work in energy storage.

Nocera is the Henry Dreyfus Professor of Energy and Professor of Chemistry at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research involves using water instead of batteries to store power. He described this technology as a process similar to photosynthesis that uses solar energy to split water molecules into oxygen and water and then recombined the gases in a fuel cell. He claimed that batteries will never be efficient enough to sustain the quantities of energy storage needed for successful renewable energy because batteries are less energy dense compared to the chemical bonds of the water molecule. While his research is not complete and the technology is a long way from being commercially available, Nocera stated that water is the future of energy storage technology and there is no way to stop it. Masiello, the KEMA innovation director, spoke of more short term solutions for energy storage, including batteries, super capacitors, compressed air, and pumped hydro-electric storage. He talked about the reliability assurance that batteries could provide for communities as local stationary storage systems, and concluded with some policy issues that still need to be worked out, like who owns the energy being stored.

Hayes Nomination Approved, Utah Lease Report Released (6/09)
David Hayes was finally confirmed to be the Deputy Secretary of the Interior, more than two months after Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Bob Bennett (R-UT) placed holds on the process. Their concern was not over Hayes himself, but unsatisfactory answers they received from the Interior Secretary Ken Salazar about last year’s oil and gas lease auction. Hayes was confirmed on May 20, 2009 when the senators lifted their holds after Salazar promised to personally review the issue. Bennett and Murkowski wanted a commitment that the Administration was pursuing a balanced energy approach.

Salazar has evaluated the lease auction of concern, under the leadership of Hayes, and released a report on June 11, 2009. The report outlines the flaws in the procedure and inaccurate information that caused Salazar to cancel 77 leases in Utah this February, which in turn started the outcry from Senator Bennett. The report concludes that some of the leases could be reinstated, while others should not be leased for various environmental and legal reasons.

The full report on the 77 Utah leases is available from DOI: http://www.doi.gov/utahreport/

GOP House Energy Bill (6/09)
The House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and 108 co-sponsors introduced the American Energy Act (H.R. 2846) on June 12, 2009, in response to the Democratic backed American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (H.R. 2454). While the two bills are similar, the emphasis of the American Energy Act is on the creation of jobs while developing renewable, nuclear, and biomass energy sources, as well as producing more domestic oil and natural gas.

The Republicans claim that the American Energy Act is an all inclusive bill that will help to clean up the environment without unnecessary taxes and without sending jobs overseas. The bill would expand all types of energy production, including drilling on the outer continental shelf and in the Arctic coastal plain. The money from the leasing of these federal lands would be used to establish a Renewable and Alternative Energy Trust Fund that provides financial assistance for renewable, alternative, and unconventional energy programs. Renewable energy expansion would also be supported with tax credits for people using or investing in renewable energy sources.

Nuclear energy would be expanded with a proposal to bring 100 new nuclear reactors online in the next 20 years. The oil shale lease program that leases federal lands to private companies for the research and development of oil shale production would be reinstated, and lastly, the bill would streamline the refinery permitting process. The American Energy Act has been referred to the House Natural Resources Committee Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

Energy Bill Passes Senate Committee (6/09)
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee voted 15 to 8 to report out a new bill entitled the American Clean Energy Leadership Act of 2009, which includes eleven bills developed within the committee. The measure contains significant legislation to help improve energy efficiency, energy security and energy market information. Some contentious issues include greater access to offshore oil and natural gas drilling in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, a national renewable electricity standard (utilities would have to provide 15 percent of their power from renewable energy sources) and new federal electricity transmission siting authority.

Details of the bill of particular interest to the geosciences community include measures for: clean energy technology development, energy innovation and workforce development, to increase domestic production and assessment of oil and natural gas, to increase production of renewable energy on public lands, to assess nuclear waste management and to understand and develop strategies regarding the energy-water nexus.

The various parts of the measure are available for review at the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee website.

Republicans Introduce Oil Shale Development Bill (6/09)
On June 1, 2009, the Ranking Member of the House Natural Resources Committee Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Doug Lamborn (R-CO) introduced a bill to expand the development of oil shale. The bill is called the PIONEER Act (The Protecting Investment in Oil shale the Next Generation of Environment, Energy, and Resource Security), H.R. 2540. Natural Resources and Energy Committee Ranking Member Doc Hastings (R-WA), a co-sponsor of the bill, stated that developing oil shale is not only a way to relieve the United States’ dependence on foreign oil, but will also boost the economy and create new American jobs.

The PIONEER Act would reinstate the Research, Development, & Demonstration (RD&D) leasing that Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar removed in February. In January, the former administration had proposed a second round of RD&D leasing, where federally owned land is leased to private companies for oil shale production. Under the PIONEER Act, the Secretary of the Interior would be allowed to temporarily reduce royalties, fees, rentals, bonus, or other payments for these leases. Lamborn believes that oil shale development cannot be accomplished without the incentives for private companies to engage in oil shale production. The bill would also establish the guidelines published by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as rules for the investment and development of commercial oil shale production on federally owned lands. While the technology needed for commercial extraction of the oil shale is several years away, the BLM regulation will provide for the development of technologies to efficiently extract the oil in an environmentally safe way.

House Introduces Deep Seabed Mineral Resources Bill (6/09)
On June 11, 2009, Delegate Faleomavaega (D-American Samoa) introduced a deep seabed mineral resources bill (H.R. 2834). The bill would direct the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to “conduct a technological capability assessment, survey, and economic feasibility study regarding recovery of minerals, other than oil and natural gas, from the shallow and deep seabed of the United States” and submit a report on their findings within two years of enactment. The seabed is defined as the areas within 200 miles of territorial seas. The bill does not authorize any specific appropriations for this work. The measure puts NOAA in charge of the survey but calls for NOAA to consult with other appropriate Federal agencies.

Coal Reserves Overestimated According to USGS Study (6/09)
In 2007 the Energy Information Administration (EIA) predicted a 240-year supply of U.S. coal reserves, based off their estimate of nearly 500 billion tons of recoverable U.S. coal reserves. However a new study released by the U.S. Geological Survey found that only 6 percent of the coal in the nation’s largest coalfield is economically recoverable, even if current market price was to increase. The study, started in 2004 to better understand the immense Gillette coalfield in the Powder Basin of Wyoming, reveals that the U.S. only has a 120-year supply. This discrepancy prompted the EIA to release a statement saying they will reassess their estimates using the new USGS data. The full report is available from the USGS.

USGS Arctic Oil and Gas Assessment Published in Science (6/09)
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recently completed a geologically based assessment of the Arctic, the Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal (CARA), to determine the potential for oil and gas resources stored in the Arctic Circle. The Arctic continental shelves provide a unique location, under 500 m of water, for these resources, which could be utilized given concern over future energy supplies. The CARA only considered areas with recoverable hydrocarbon volumes larger than 50 million barrels of oil or 300 billion cubic feet of gas, excluding smaller accumulations and nonconventional resources like oil shales and gas hydrates. The assessment also used mapping and assessing units (AUs) based on the sedimentary makeup of the Arctic. The average assessment found for the Arctic consists of double the amount of oil thought to be there originally. The study concluded undiscovered oil in the Arctic may account for almost four percent of the world’s remaining conventionally recoverable oil resources. In addition, they concluded the Arctic may hold three times the amount of undiscovered gas as oil. The report was included in the May 29, 2009 issue of Science Magazine.

Interior Secretary Reports on Carbon Capture Storage (6/09)
On June 3, 2009, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar submitted a report to Congress on recommendations for a national program that would select sites for carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) projects. The report was prepared with the assistance of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Office of Fossil Energy in the Department of Energy. The recommendations included criteria for the identification of potential sites, suggesting that deep saline formations were the most suitable due to their large storage capacity. Other potential sites are oil and gas fields, deep saline water reservoir rocks, and coal beds. The geologic formation selected must be able to store the injected CO2 for long timescales, and monitoring the site after it is sealed must also remain functional. The report also indicated that research into environmental safety is still needed, and that investigational large-scale projects must also be tested to ensure the long term isolation of the CO2. The USGS will assess storage in oil and gas fields and saline formations using a new methodology and funding in the fiscal year 2010 budget.

The full report (PDF) is available from the DOI.

Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Improved Manufactured Housing (6/09)
The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) hosted a briefing on June 25, 2009 entitled “Helping Low-Income Households Reduce Energy Bills and Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Improved Manufactured Housing” to inform the public and congressional staff on the role manufactured housing can play in energy, climate, and affordable housing policy solutions. The speakers were Mark Wolfe (Energy Programs Consortium), George McCarthy (Ford Foundation), JoAnn Choate (Maine State Housing Authority), Stacey Epperson (Frontier Housing, Inc.), and David Szymanski (USGS/GSA Science Fellow in the Office of Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT)). The presentations focused on the need to replace pre-1976 mobile homes that were built before the HUD code took effect with energy-efficient manufactured homes which are safer and require less energy, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Currently, there are over two million units in the U.S. that low-income families call home despite unhealthy living conditions created by the lack of safety in these homes and inefficiency in energy use, causing them to have high energy bills they can ill afford. H.R. 1749 has been introduced to provide owners of pre-1976 units with a $7,500 rebate to leverage with state funding to purchase a new Energy Star qualified manufactured home. The bill is a provision in the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (H.R. 2454) and Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT) plans to introduce companion legislation in the Senate. The need to replace these homes was highlighted at the briefing with one example of a pre-1976 mobile home which when replaced with an Energy Star manufactured home reduced the owner’s electricity usage from 6,000 kilowatts per month to only 1,600 kilowatts per month.

The power points from the speakers at the briefing are available on the EESI briefing page.

ACS Briefing on “Enabling Renewable Energy: Building a Bigger Battery” (6/09)
The Senate Science and Technology Caucus and the American Chemical Society’s “Science & the Congress Project” hosted a briefing on June 16, 2009 that discussed the status of energy storage technology as a way to make solar and wind energy more reliable energy sources. Following introductory comments by Mr. Richard Campbell on current energy and climate legislation such as H.R. 2454, four guest speakers gave presentations on their views of electricity storage. Dr. Bernard Lee, a retiree from the Institute of Gas and Technology, spoke about Massive Electricity Storage (MES) that can convert intermittent power to dispatchable power for the grid. He suggested that an electrochemical battery would be the most feasible MES technology for the large scale needed. He urged Congress to recognize the importance of energy storage and fund new R&D. Dr. Yet-Ming Chiang, from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, stated that the grid will be a hybrid of renewable and non-renewable energies, relating the development of energy storage to the recent and rapid development of hybrid cars. Dr. Ali Nourai, the Strategic Technology Consultant from American Electric Power (AEP), proclaimed AEP’s experience using energy storage and described AEP’s vision of future energy storage, where small, utility controlled batteries store energy for every four to five houses. Lastly, Mr. Bradford Roberts, the Executive Director of the Electricity Storage Association, showed the different types of batteries that are in place today, highlighting the world’s largest battery in Japan. The battery is attached to a wind farm, making the wind energy continuously dispatchable. He noted that the technology for this battery was started by the Ford Motor Company in the 1970s, but abandoned. Currently the U.S. does not have deployable technology for large scale energy storage, something necessary for increased reliance on wind or solar energy.

Forest Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source in the United States (6/09)
The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) hosted a briefing on June 11, 2009 entitled “Forest Biomass: Renewable, Low Carbon, and Limited” to inform the public and congressional staff on the role that forest biomass can play in contributing to renewable energy supplies in the United States. The speakers were Ken Skog (U.S. Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory), Bob Abt (North Carolina State University), Ben Larson (Union of Concerned Scientists), and Michael Goergen (Society of American Foresters). The presentation focused on biomass as an opportunity to develop a new energy market while reducing the threat of climate change. It will be necessary to carefully develop this market so as to avoid negative environmental impacts to four critical areas: water quality, soil productivity, wildlife habitat, and biodiversity.

To qualify for the market, renewable biomass must not deplete forest resources and be readily re-grown. The use of the biomass resource cannot degrade the ecological potential to produce a sustained yield from that resource. All development options need to include different avenues through which forest owners can participate, as well as safeguards for certain critical private and federal lands. If this market generates more demand for biomass, a higher pace of thinning for fire hazards and forest health as well as a greater supply from traditional sources like pulpwood will likely be required to meet the need. In addition, questions remain due to how biomass fits in with the Renewable Fuels Standard of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 which provides challenges in developing a renewable biomass energy market. There is a need to move toward incentives and outcomes that are consistent with the interaction of energy, forest, agriculture, environmental, and carbon policy. Forests can serve as an important resource to mitigate climate change, but they must be managed in such a way so that they are carbon sinks and not carbon sources.

The power points from the speakers at the briefing are available on the EESI briefing page.

EIA Releases 2009 Energy Outlook Report (5/09)
The Annual Energy Outlook 2009 (AEO2009) report from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) was released in March 2009, with supplemental reference material released in April 2009. The AEO2009 analyzes U.S. energy supply and demand and makes projections on energy supply and demand through 2030. The economic forecasts were updated to incorporate the stimulus effects and the recent, rapid fluctuations in U.S. and global economies. Overall, though, the projections focus on what drives the energy markets in the long-term. The key issues covered are: higher but uncertain world oil prices, growing concern about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and its impacts on energy investment decisions, the increasing use of renewable fuels, the increasing production of unconventional natural gas, the shift in the transportation fleet to more efficient vehicles, and improved efficiency in end-use appliances.

The key projections note that world oil prices could swing from $50 to $200 per barrel of oil through to 2030; there might be no growth in U.S. oil consumption because of increasing oil prices, fuel efficient vehicles and the use of biofuels; and there might be more limited growth in coal-fired power plants and much higher growth in natural gas-fired power plant than previously predicted because of greenhouse gas emission reductions.

Overall energy consumption is projected to increase by 0.5 percent per year through 2030 and fossil fuels will account for more than 75 percent of all consumption with nuclear, biofuels and renewables accounting for about 25 percent. Overall electricity demand is projected to increase by 1 percent annually from 2007 to 2030 and the demand will be met by nearly the same proportion of energy resources for electricty with the most noticeable increase from renewable energy resources (47 percent from coal, 18 percent from nuclear, 14 percent from renewables and 20 percent from natural gas for the 2030 reference case).

The full report, summaries, and supplemental material are all available online:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/

Senate Energy Bill Proceeds Slowly (5/09)
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee continues work on a massive energy bill in bits and pieces. Sections on appliance efficiency; the energy and water nexus; the manufacturing sector's efficiency; work force training; a clean energy bank administration; transmission siting, planning and financing; grid cybersecurity; and a refined petroleum product reserve have been completed. Amendments on a renewable energy standard (RES) and building efficiency will be considered in the first week of June. Still to come is language on oil and gas provisions including possible funds for an inventory of outer continental shelf resources.

Another part of the energy bill is a measure limiting liability for carbon capture and sequestration projects. The Department of Energy Carbon Capture and Sequestration Program Amendments Act of 2009 (S. 1013) would authorize the Secretary of Energy to carry out a program to demonstrate commercial application of integrated systems for long-term geological storage of carbon dioxide (more than one million tons of carbon annually) without liability. Parties must obtain certification that they are complying with state and federal drinking water protection requirements and conduct tests to verify carbon is not escaping. The bill would also allow the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to authorize projects on federal lands.

A large number of amendments and significant additional debate is expected on many parts of the legislation and the committee has already missed their self-imposed deadline of the Memorial Day recess to complete the bill. Even if the bill passes the committee, there is considerable uncertainty about when it might be considered by the full Senate. Majority Leader, Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) has indicated that health care legislation will be considered before energy legislation. The House is not considering an energy bill similar to the Senate’s though there is some overlap of sections with the House climate change and energy bill (H.R. 2454).

Please visit the Senate Energy and Commerce’s Energy Bill 2009 web page for the full text and drafts of the different parts of this legislation at: http://energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=EnergyBill.2009

Tar Sands And Oil Shale Are Examined On The Hill (5/09)
The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) hosted a briefing for the public and congressional staff on the economic, energy, environmental, and security issues surrounding tar sands and oil shale as part of their series on alternative transportation fuels. James Burkhard of the Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA), Susan Casey-Lefkowitz of the Natural Resources Defense Council, James Bartis of the RAND Corporation, and Michael Levi of the Council on Foreign Relations presented the status of research and development as well as the positive and negative implications surrounding these fuels. The well-rounded presentation showed the vast extent of the resources as well as the environmental dangers and copious water use associated with developing the industry. They concluded that more research or test facilities, oversight, and strict regulations are needed in order to create a “sustainable industry.”

The power points and audio recording of the briefing are available on the EESI briefing page. For information on the CERA study to determine the needs and priorities of the tar sands industry, read the study overview.

Senate Working on Energy and Water Bills (4/09)
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee has four major energy and water bills highlighted on their website besides a measure to reform hardrock mining that was summarized in last month ’s Monthly Review.

The 21st Century Energy Technology Deployment Act (S.949) would implement reforms to the Department of Energy (DOE) loan guarantee program, including creating a new “Clean Energy Investment Fund” to allow collected costs and payments be used to support more technology deployment. The bill would also create a new entity housed in DOE, the Clean Energy Deployment Administration (CEDA), with strong financial expertise and with a specific purpose to create an attractive investment environment for the development and deployment of new clean energy technologies. Once the Secretary and the Administrator of CEDA agree it is ready, the Clean Energy Investment Fund becomes the seed fund for the new entity.

The Restoring America’s Manufacturing Leadership through Energy Efficiency Act of 2009 (S. 661) would implement programs at DOE to help manufacturers and industry develop energy efficient technologies through loans and public-private partnerships for the development of new technologies.

The Energy and Water Integration Act of 2009 (S. 531) directs the Secretary of Energy to have the National Academy of Sciences conduct an in-depth analysis of the impact of energy development and production on U.S. water resources. It requires the Secretary to conduct a study to identify the best available technologies and related strategies to maximize water and energy efficiency in the production of electricity by each type of generation. It also requires the Secretary to develop an Energy-Water Research and Development Roadmap and the Administrator of the Energy Information Administration to conduct an assessment of energy consumption in various sectors of the economy that are associated with the acquisition, treatment, or delivery of water.

The bill also directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to evaluate the quantities of energy used in water storage and delivery operations in major reclamation projects; and  to operate, manage, and maintain the Brackish Groundwater National Desalination Research Facility in Otero County, New Mexico, to carry out research, development, and demonstration activities to develop technologies and methods that promote brackish groundwater desalination as a viable method to increase water supply in a cost-effective manner.

American Chemical Society hosts briefing on “Understanding the U.S. Energy Profile”
On March 27th, 2009, the American Chemical Society (ACS) held a briefing with 4 panelists who discussed the current status and outlook of U.S. energy supplies. Included in the briefing was an overview of the relationship of national security and energy policy, the current trends in energy sources and uses in the nation, fossil energy supplies, and a summary of the role renewable energy sources play in the nation’s energy profile.

Dr. Robert Fri of the National Research Council first presented an overview of national security implications associated with U.S. dependency on fossil fuels. Fri identified 2 “security” issues, one of “national” security and the other “economic” security. He stated that “national security is the least well understood but the most thought about part of the energy question,” especially in regards to shaping foreign policy. In terms of economic security, Fri indicated that with 85 percent of the U.S. energy supply based on fossil fuels and billions of dollars exported each year for oil economic security is highly vulnerable to price shocks on the global markets as evident from the massive 2008 fluctuation in oil prices. Fri bluntly stated that “energy independence isn’t going to happen” because fossil fuels are commodities traded in global markets, but that the U.S. can reduce its dependency on foreign sources of fossil fuels, which could help buffer the nation from geopolitical instability and wild market fluctuations.

Dr. Howard Gruenspecht, Acting Administrator of the Energy Information Administration, presented a summary of current sources and uses within the U.S. energy profile along with impacts a carbon cap-and-trade system would have on consumer prices for electricity, oil, and natural gas. Gruenspectht also shared various benefits/conflicts to different approaches intended to simultaneously enhance energy security and reduce carbon emissions. For example, improving vehicle fuel efficiency in the U.S. would be a win-win situation by reducing demands of foreign imports and also reduce carbon emissions, whereas carbon capture and sequestration has the benefit of removing carbon that would otherwise enter the atmosphere, but is also energy and water intensive, so is a win-lose situation.

Dr. Scott Tinker, the Texas State Geologist and President of the American Association of Professional Geologists (AAPG), presented the current state of fossil fuel use in the U.S. and abroad, and noted several important trends in the fossil fuel arena likely to impact the nation’s energy portfolio. Tinker stated that energy transitions take time and are limited by scale, and that fossil fuels are essential for the U.S. in the next 20-30 years as a bridge to the new technologies and renewable sources which will replace fossil fuels. Tinker indicated that based on his analysis of global trends “the world has and will use coal,” but stated emerging technologies in carbon capture could reduce global carbon emissions. He also indicated that the U.S. only has about 3 percent of the total world petroleum reserves, and a significant portion of this 3 percent is found in limited access areas. To conclude his presentation, Tinker urged that fossil fuels are not immediately taken of the nation’s energy strategy, stating that “proposed fossil energy policies will likely exacerbate an already poor situation.”

Dr. Allan Bard professor at the University of Texas-Austin, provided an overview on the current state of renewable energies in the U.S. energy portfolio. As of 2007, Bard stated that 9 percent of U.S. energy sources came from renewable sources, and of that nine percent, hydroelectric power provided 70 percent. Bard also shared some of the challenges with renewable energies, including new transmission infrastructure and the continual generating capacity of sources such as solar and wind, which Bard stated are only 28 and 40 percent reliable respectively. Supporting Dr. Tinker’s statement that energy transitions can often take long periods of time, Bard presented a somewhat sobering example of the difficult challenges in the renewable energies sector as defined in a new Department of Energy analysis on the future of wind energy. Bard indicated that for the nation to get 20 percent of its electricity from wind by 2030, 13 wind turbines would need to be installed every day across the nation for the next 21 years, an ambitious goal that would still leave upwards of 60 percent of the nation’s electricity derived from fossil sources. (03/09) 

Brookings Calls for a New Bold Approach to Energy Research
Presenting at the National Press Club on February 10th, the Brookings’ Metropolitan Policy Program proposed a bold, new initiative of creating a network of regionally based energy “discovery-innovation” institutes (e-DIIs) across the nation. Such a shift in how the U.S. conducts energy research aims to renew the American economy, energy security, and to address global climate change. The Brookings report, “Energy Discovery-Innovation Institutes: A Step toward America's Energy Sustainability”, calls for these institutes to function as hubs of a research network connecting the nation’s top scientists, engineers, and facilities. This network would facilitate quick transfer of data and resources between research universities and laboratories resulting in accelerated movement of innovative technologies to the marketplace.

National Association of State University and Land Grant Colleges (NASULGC) president Peter McPherson stated at the event that “the Brookings proposal is exceptionally clear about just how unsustainable our way of life has become and the challenges we face in completely restructuring energy production, distribution, and use to fit within the natural limits of our climate and environment.” McPherson further added that “Perhaps the report’s most important point is that energy research, technology development, and commercialization are grossly underfunded, by as much as an order of magnitude.  We are talking about the need for a large influx of new resources, not simply a reallocation of what we already have.” Although the Brookings proposal involves a paradigm shift to the approach of solving energy problems in the United States, McPherson emphasized the need for the shift to occur internationally as well. He sees the Obama Administration playing an important role in the transfer abroad of both technologies and paradigms shifts in terms of energy use. (02/09)

DOE Report Calls for a “Game-Changing” Shift in Energy Development
A December 2008 report from a subcommittee of the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Advisory Committee stated that current approaches to resolving today’s energy issues are not up to task, and that the rate of improvement is too slow to meet the needs of the nation. The report further explained that current efforts need to be “propelled forward by paradigm-changing breakthroughs: new ideas that change ‘the rules of the game.’” The BES office of the DOE, as described in the report, is to play a pivotal role in this transformation. Although the authors also note that engineers, scientists, venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs must also work in concert to promote the movement of innovative technologies to the marketplace.

The report emphasized that BES must lead U.S. energy research efforts in the direction of new discoveries and pool together “dream teams” of highly educated talent and give them the most advanced tools to increase the rate of discovery. The report tasks BES with leading a national effort to recruit the best talent through workforce development and early career programs to inspire young talent nationwide to strive to be the discoverers and innovators for tomorrow’s energy solutions.(02/09)

President Bush Issues Directive on Arctic Policy 
In his final days in office, President Bush issued a 10-page directive on Arctic policy. The directive calls for federal agencies to define areas that the U.S. could claim as U.S. territory, determine the energy resource potential of the Arctic, and look into the need for greater environmental protection, maritime transportation and regional infrastructure. The directive also supports increased funding for research of the impact of climate change on the region. The U.S. Geological Survey, the National Science Foundation, NOAA and NASA would be just some of the agencies that would need funding and cooperation to meet the objectives of the directive.

It would also be prudent for the U.S. to ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea if the U.S. wishes to make claims to parts of the Arctic seabed and review the claims of other nations. President Bush has supported the ratification of the treaty, but conservative Republicans have blocked the ratification in the Senate so far. The treaty allows for cooperation on resources of the seas, both the waters and the seabed and has a process for judging the claims of nations for seabed  extensions of their continental shelf. If a nation can show that the seabed is part of their continental shelf then they are entitled to the resources. The nations that determine these claims include the nations who have signed the treaty. (01/09)

Back to top

Background

Energy policy, a hot topic on Capitol Hill, has become coupled with the issue of climate change as policymakers focus attention on conservation, efficiency and alternative energy options.

In his 2007 State of the Union address, President Bush presented the nation with an ambitious new energy plan that focused on increasing fuel economy and alternative fuel availability, warning that the nation's dependency on foreign oil makes us vulnerable. President Bush urged Americans to "reduce gasoline usage in the United States by 20 percent in the next ten years." Achieving the President's "twenty in ten" goal, however, demands a dramatic increase in the availability of alternative energy sources. The President challenged lawmakers and private industry to replace 15 percent of U.S. gasoline consumption with alternative fuels by 2017.

Congress held many committee hearings in early 2007 to discuss energy issues. There was a significant emphasis on the need for increased investment in energy-related research and development (R&D), including reports published by the Government Accountability Office and National Academies. The 110th Congress’ work on energy issues culminated in the passage of the omnibus Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (H.R. 6), which was signed into law (Public Law 110-140) in December 2007. The law increases vehicle fuel efficiency standards and provides other conservation, efficiency and alternative energy provisions that legislators thought were missing from the previous congress' major energy law, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (also H.R. 6). The Energy Independence and Security Act also authorizes funds for research and development (R&D), some of it in the geosciences.

Legislators continued to consider energy issues throughout the second session of the 110th Congress in 2008 and some additional energy bills were introduced. Energy issues were often discussed in relation to climate change legislation and Congress seemed prepared to consider energy policy that dealt with climate change. However, skyrocketing oil prices in the summer of 2008 shifted the emphasis to supply and demand issues. President Bush lifted the executive ban on expanding offshore drilling in an effort to pressure Congress to end the moratorium on new offshore drilling that is normally part of the Interior appropriations bill. This caused significant acrimony in Congress and shut down the appropriations process.

On July 23, 2008 the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) released an assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources north of the Arctic Circle of which 84 percent occurs in offshore areas.  The estimates of 90 billion barrels of oil and 1,669 trillion cubic feet of natural gas were determined using a geology-based probabilistic methodology and account for 13 and 30 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil and gas resources, respectively. The study included resources considered technically recoverable using existing technologies, but did not include economic factors, the presence of permanent sea ice or oceanic water depth in the determination. This has spurred renewed attention to the Law of the Sea Treaty, furthered the offshore drilling efforts and searches for unconventional fossil fuels (such as oil shales or gas hydrates).

In September of 2008 the House approved a bill (H.R. 6899) that would expand offshore drilling as well as incentives for alternative energy. At about the same time, a bipartisan group of senators referred to as the “gang of 10” began discussing compromise legislation that would allow some more offshore drilling combined with more funding for alternative energy. The gang grew to a super gang of as many as 22 senators who participated in an unusual all-day energy summit held by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee with the support of Senate leadership. Although an energy bill has yet to be introduced in the Senate as a result of these discussions, the framework has been laid for the 111th Congress to move forward with energy legislation.

General background information on the issues surrounding energy policy that Congress has been working on is available from several Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports.

Addition information on energy legislation in the 110th Congress is available at http://www.agiweb.org/gap/legis110/energy.html.

Sources: AGI's Monthly Review, DOE, E&E Daily

Contributed by Corina Cerovski-Darriau, Government Affairs staff; Clint Carney, 2009 AGI/AAPG Spring Intern; Stephanie Praus, 2009 AGI/AIPG Summer Intern; Rachel Potter, 2009 AGI/AIPG Summer Intern; Mollie Pettit, 2009 AGI/AAPG Fall Intern; and Joey Fiore, 2009 AGI/AIPG Summer Intern

Background section includes material from AGI's Energy Policy Pages for the110th Congress.

Please send any comments or requests for information to AGI Government Affairs Program.

Last updated on March 8, 2010.


  Information Services |Geoscience Education |Public Policy |Environmental
Geoscience
 |
Publications |Workforce |AGI Events


agi logo

© 2010 All rights reserved. American Geological Institute, 4220 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22302-1502.
Please send any comments or problems with this site to: webmaster@agiweb.org.
Privacy Policy