AIPG Definitions
(Revised January 12, 1991)
1. “Geology” is the science that treats the Earth and its origin and
history, in general; the investigation, including collection of specimens,
of the Earth’s constituent rocks, minerals, fossils, solids, fluids including
surface and underground waters, gases and other material from the center
of its core to the outer limits of its atmosphere; the study of the Earth;
and the application and utilization of this knowledge of the Earth. The
knowledge and principles of geology are also applied to extraterrestrial
bodies.
2. “Professional geological work” is application of the principles,
theories, laws, and body of knowledge encompassed in the science of geology
at an advanced and skillful level requiring education, experience, and
the capability of interpretation and evaluation.
3. “Geologist” is a person who, by reason of his or her knowledge of
geology acquired by education and practical experience, is qualified to
engage in the practice of geology.
4. A “Professional Geologist” is a geologist who has accumulated a
minimum of five (5) years’ post-baccalaureate experience in the practice
of geology as a vocation, and who has a sustained record of adherence to
exemplary standards of professional and ethical conduct.
5. “Practice of Geology” is the performance of geological service or
work including but not limited to consultation, investigation, evaluation,
planning, mapping, and inspection of geological work, and the responsible
supervision thereof. A person shall be construed to practice or offer to
practice geology, within the meaning and intent of this definition, who
practices any branch of the profession of geology; or who by verbal claim,
sign, advertisement, letterhead, card or in any other way represents himself
or herself to be a geologist; or through the use of some other title implies
that he or she is a geologist; himself or herself as able to perform or
who does perform any geologic services or work recognized by the Executive
Committee of the Institute as the practice of geology.
AIPG Policy Regarding State
Registration/Licensing of Geologists
(Adopted October 6, 1989)
AIPG believes that its certification of professionals
by their peers as to their competence and ethical behavior is to be preferred
as the most effective available means to protect the public health, safety,
and welfare. Self-regulation is the most desirable form of certification
and regulation of professional practice.
However, AIPG recognizes that there are jurisdictions
in which self-regulation provides no legal standing, thus adversely affecting
geologists’ ability to practice their profession to effectively protect
public health, safety, and welfare. If the Certified Professional Geologists
in such a jurisdiction find that the protection of the public health, safety,
and welfare requires the statutory regulation of geologists, AIPG will
support efforts to assure sound and reasonable statutory regulation appropriate
to the conditions of that jurisdiction.
As the national organization of professional geologists,
AIPG further recognizes the need for and advocates uniformity of standards
so that the mobility of geologists will not be impeded, and so that their
varied skills may be available throughout the nation.
AIPG Policy On Specialty Certification/Registration
(Adopted August 23, 1990)
Every Certified Professional Geologist should be
competent to meet the basic geologic needs of the client or employer; to
recognize those situations in which additional specialized knowledge, skill
and/or experience is required; and to recommend appropriate consultation
when the interest of the client, the employer, or the public are thereby
best served.
No Professional Geologist should perform professional
services or issue professional advice that is outside the scope of the
education and experience of that geologist.
Specialty certification should be an addition to,
rather than a substitute for, certification as a Professional Geologist.
Specialties and their definitions are constantly
evolving and changing. A specialty definition that is valid when propounded
may become inadequate or inaccurate with the passage of time. Old specialties
change, new specialties appear, and boundaries become obscure.
Specialties should be organized, defined, and administered
by those who practice in the field, i.e. the specialty technical societies,
e.g., American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Association of Engineering
Geologists, Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers, etc. They
should not be defined or administered by statute or by government regulation.
Therefore, AIPG believes that the administration
of geological specialties is most appropriately accomplished solely through
recognized certification programs sponsored by technical societies on a
purely voluntary basis as a means of identifying competence in a specialized
field of geology following establishment of basic qualifications through
certification under AIPG and, where necessary, applicable state laws.
AIPG Policy on Environmental and Multi-discipline Registration
and Certification
(Adopted January 25, 1992)
1. To the extent that States require licensed individuals to perform
environmental services, licenses should be issued on a discipline, rather
than a multi-discipline, or cross-discipline, basis.
2. AIPG encourages the development of national certification programs
for other disciplines, e.g., chemistry, toxicology, etc.
3. AIPG does not recommend or support any of the current multidiscipline
certification, licensing, or registration programs.
4. AIPG will consider support of certification programs that
a. are national in scope or are uniform state programs;
b. effectively protect the public;
c. require appropriate credentials;
d. assure adequate understanding of a body of knowledge
necessary to perform the certified function;
e. require adequate working experience in the field
being certified; and
f. confirm the established integrity of the certified
individual.
5. AIPG does not support certification, licensing, or registration
programs that are merely a list of persons who have stated that they offer
certain services with no certainty that their qualifications to offer those
services have been verified.
AIPG Policy On Environmental Investigations and Audits
(Adopted January 12, 1991)
AIPG’s position is that environmental investigations and audits should
be performed by those best qualified. Thus, the geologic portions of environmental
investigations and audits should be performed by geologists who are qualified
to do so by appropriate training and experience. Federal and State laws
that govern such investigations and audits should reflect this philosophy.
AIPG Policy on Appraisals of Mineral and Related Interests
(Adopted January 12, 1991)
AIPG’s position is that appraisals of interests in real or personal
property should be performed by those best qualified. Thus, appraisals
of mineral, or other geologically related, interests should be performed
by geologists, or in some cases engineers, who are qualified to do so by
appropriate training and experience. Federal and State laws that govern
such appraisals should reflect this philosophy.
AIPG Policy on the Clean Water
Act
(Adopted January 20, 1996)
The American Institute of Professional Geologists believes that water
quality throughout the nation must be protected and in many areas restored.
The framework established under the Clean Water Act has enabled the Federal,
state and local governments, working in concert with industry, to make
progress toward cleaner water. Further, the Act has served to promote recycling
and reuse of substances that might otherwise be discharged into the nation’s
waters. The Clean Water Act of 1987 should be extended and funded to restore
and protect our nation’s waters. We believe that flexibility in determining
the most beneficial and cost-effective treatment of wastewater is the most
efficient incentive. Water conservation should be encouraged.
AIPG Policy on the Safe Drinking Water
Act
(Adopted January 20, 1996)
In 1974 Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act
that required the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish drinking
water standards and monitoring requirements to ensure that American systems
deliver safe drinking water. In 1986 Congress amended the Safe Drinking
Water Act to accelerate EPA’s standard-setting procedures and establish
a monitoring program. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was required
to issue regulations for 83 contaminants in 3 years and 25 new contaminants
every year thereafter. The 1986 amendments also required surface water
to be disinfected and filtered and groundwater to be disinfected, significantly
increasing compliance costs.
The American Institute of Professional Geologists
believes that, in determining national standards for water quality, Congress
should direct EPA to base its standards on scientifically sound principles
for protection of human health. The ability of EPA to require water systems
to test for additional contaminants must consider the human health risk
posed by the contaminant. Congress must eliminate specific numbers goals
for identification of new contaminants in drinking water. It is the role
of EPA to establish scientifically sound standards that will assure safe
drinking water for every citizen in the nation, and human health should
be the basis for any contaminant program.
Groundwater contamination is growing in alarming proportions. Groundwater
withdrawals have increased four-fold in the past 50 years. To prevent further
deterioration of groundwater supplies and groundwater quality, the American
Institute of Professional Geologists believes that groundwater planning
and management is necessary to preserve this precious resource. Groundwater
planning and management should be coordinated. Groundwater policy should
be built upon existing Federal, state, and local laws and management techniques.
Any policy should recognize the diversity of hydrologic, climatic, economic,
legal, and social factors within various states and regions. Concerted
water conservation programs should be encouraged. Interstate compacts or
agreements will be necessary to resolve interstate disputes.
AIPG Policy on National
Water Resources
(Adopted January 20, 1996)
The National Water Resources Policy that has evolved
over the last 30 years exists today as a cumbersome and poorly coordinated
effort to manage our nation’s water resources. Jurisdiction for Federal
water projects is scattered throughout agencies of the Federal government
and committees of Congress. The American Institute of Professional Geologists
sees a need for clearer, more coordinated, and more consistent Federal
policies. These policies should recognize and build upon constitutions,
statutes, policies, and programs of the states as a fundamental basis for
a national effort toward better water resource management.
The role of the government is to establish a framework
of national objectives for the protection, management, restoration, development,
and use of water and related resources to meet national economic, environmental,
and social objectives and to assist in implementing such actions with state
and local governments. There must be continuity in support of water management
programs. There must be flexibility in the entire support system for water
resource planning and management. National policy must be flexible enough
to accommodate both environmental and economic differences that vary by
region.
AIPG Policy on the Use of Professional Seals
(Adopted January 20, 1996)
The American Institute of Professional Geologists
(AIPG) recognizes that the purpose of a professional seal or stamp, including
the electronic image thereof, is to authenticate geological documents prepared
by or under the supervision of the person whose seal is used.
Geological documents include any document or illustration,
paper or electronic, resulting from professional service or supervision
of professional service, where such service requires the application of
geological principles or data.
The “Certified Professional Geologist” and other
professional seals or stamps should be applied only to those documents
for which the person whose seal is imprinted takes full professional responsibility.
If more than one person accepts responsibility, the document should bear
the signature and seal of each and a notation indicating the portion(s)
of the document for which each accepts responsibility.
AIPG recommends legal proscriptions against the
making of changes to a document sealed by a professional geologist. If
changes are required, either a new document incorporating the changes shall
be prepared, or an addendum noting the changes shall be made. Each document,
original, new, or addendum, is the professional responsibility of the document’s
author(s).
AIPG Position on Mergers between
the United States Geological Survey and other Government Agencies
(Adopted January 20, 1996)
AIPG supports the principle of integration of and
communication among, all scientific disciplines so as to provide for appropriate
interaction and coordination between their practitioners, both in scientific
endeavors and in the determination of national policy.
Further, AIPG enthusiastically supports the original
mission of the United States Geological Survey and encourages the maintenance
and expansion of the activities of the Geological Survey in ways that are
consistent with this mission.
AIPG looks favorably upon such mergers, when mergers between the United
States Geological Survey and other government agencies that add scientific
expertise, enhance the Geological Survey’s ability to fulfill its historic
mission, and do not adversely affect the operation of the Geological Survey.
AIPG Position on the Mission and
Name of the United States Geological Survey
(Adopted April 26, 1997)
AIPG supports keeping “geological” in the name of
the United States Geological Survey as a bureau within the Department of
Interior.
Geology is “the study of the planet Earth–the materials
of which it is made, the processes that act on these materials, the products
formed, and the history of the planet and its life forms since its origin.”
(Glossary of Geology, American Geological Institute, 1987). By AIPG’s definition,
“geology is the science that treats the Earth and its origin and history,
in general; the investigation, including collection of specimens, of the
Earth’s constituent rocks, minerals, fossils, solids, fluids including
surface and underground waters, gases and other material from the center
of its core to the outer limits of its atmosphere; the study of the Earth;
and the application and utilization of this knowledge of the Earth. The
knowledge and principles of geology are also applied to extraterrestrial
bodies.” By these definitions, geology has vital applications to a variety
of national issues ranging from natural resources, to hazards, to environmental
concerns. At a time when more geologic information is required to better
address numerous environmental issues in response to an expanding population
and diminishing resources, geology is more vital to the safety, health,
and welfare of our citizens, not less.
AIPG enthusiastically supports the Congressionally
mandated original mission of the USGS (1879), to classify the public lands
and examine the geological structure, mineral resources, and products of
the national domain. This mission has evolved into one that is much broader
and self-defined, as stated in the Strategic Plan for the USGS, dated May
1996: “The U.S. Geological Survey provides the Nation with reliable, impartial
information to describe and understand the Earth. This information is used
to: minimize loss of life and property from natural disasters; manage water,
biological, energy, and mineral resources; enhance and protect the quality
of life; and contribute to wise economic and physical development.” AIPG
supports this expanded mission only to the extent that it applies to activities
that are clearly in the national interest. The livelihoods of many AIPG
members and other professional geologists are dependent on projects and
activities that are of local and state concern. We believe that it is inappropriate
for a Federal agency to duplicate and compete with them on these types
of projects. The new Biological Resources Division of the USGS fits well
into both the original mission and the more recent mission statement.
Activities of all divisions of the USGS appropriately
fall within the term “geological.” Ecological and environmental concerns
of the Biological Resources Division; all surface- and ground-water activities
of the Water Resources Division; hazard, energy- and mineral-resource,
geologic mapping, and environmental programs of the Geologic Division;
and base-map preparation of the National Mapping Division are directly
related to studies of the Earth and “geology.”
A move away from the term “geological” in the agency’s
name would not only be inappropriate by definition but also would be confusing
to the public. The fiscal and other costs of changing the name of the USGS
would far outweigh any benefits of such a change.
The USGS has developed an excellent reputation for
impartiality and defensible science to help solve national problems. Symbolic
destruction of the very best of impartial science in the federal realm
is unwarranted.
AIPG Policy on Relationships
between Professions
(Adopted July 14, 1997)
Some aspects of geology and other professions are
inter-related and inter-dependent, and activities in one field may bring
close contact with one or more of the others. In order to provide guidance
for individual practitioners and regulatory agencies, it is desirable to
clarify professional relationships at the interface between the professions.
If an individual by formal training and experience
has become qualified in more than one profession according to the standards
of those fields within a jurisdiction, that person should then be privileged
to be licensed, certified, or otherwise legally qualified to practice,
in those fields in that jurisdiction and to operate within the applicable
standards of those fields.
It is recognized that an individual who is qualified
principally in one profession may, by formal training or by experience,
have acquired a working knowledge of aspects of other fields pertinent
to that person’s principal activities. In such cases, the practitioner
should be adequately guided and constrained by the statutes and code of
ethics associated with his or her primary professional affiliation.
Questions that arise about activities at the interface
between professions may not have a clear resolution within the applicable
statutes and may require judgement as to the extent to which practice in
the secondary field(s) may be “incidental” to practice in the primary field.
When statutory boards exist, the matter should be resolved between them
on a case-by-case basis, with each notifying the other when such a question
arises. In the partial or total absence of such boards, the matter may
require resolution through mediation or arbitration.
All decisions in such matters should be based solely
on the technical and ethical qualifications of the individual as they apply
to the task in question and, particularly, to the protection of the public.
The protection of the public should be the paramount consideration.
AIPG Policy on the Exercise
of Professional Judgement
(Adopted March 31, 1998)
The American Institute of Professional Geologists (AIPG) strongly supports the use of professional judgement as the primary guiding factor in the study or assessment of any particular site or physical location. Each professional geologist must be free to exercise professional judgement as guided by his or her education, past training, and relevant experience. Professional judgement is critical to the appropriate use of the principles and methods required for the study of any particular site or physical location with respect to its intended use or remediation. AIPG considers that prescriptive professional practice standards relating to geologic practice are contrary to the public interest. The use of prescriptive standards discourages the recognition or consideration of the geologic factors and circumstances making each particular site or physical location unique. Unconsidered application of prescriptive standards may result in some unnecessary activities being done and other necessary activities being left undone. In addition, such prescriptive standards will prevent the use of new and improved methods for addressing the problem in question. While AIPG recognizes that various informal ‘standards' exist and that such standards can be useful, these standards are necessarily incomplete guides due to the uniqueness of each site and thus require the exercise of professional judgement in their application. Any geological study must be based on sound scientific principles, data, and reasoning, and these bases should be well documented.
Please send any comments or requests for information to the AGI Government Affairs Program.
Posted February 9, 2000
| Information Services | | Geoscience Education | | Public Policy | | Environmental Geoscience | | Publications | | Workforce | | AGI Events | ||
|
© 2010 All rights reserved. American Geological Institute,
4220 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22302-1502. | ||||||||