AGI Fiscal Year 2006 Testimony to House Labor,
Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies Appropriations
Subcommittee
Written Testimony Submitted by
Linda Rowan, Director of Government Affairs
American Geological Institute
to the U. S. House of Representatives
Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and
Related Agencies
April 15, 2005
To the Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
Thank you for this opportunity to provide the American Geological
Institute's perspective on fiscal year (FY) 2006 appropriations
for the Department of Education's Mathematics and Science Partnership
program.
In 1999, the Third International Math and Science Study found that
the longer U.S. students are in school, the farther they fall behind
in math and science proficiency in international comparisons. That
prompted President Bush to propose the National Math and Science
Partnership (MSP) program as part of No Child Left Behind. The goal
of the partnership program is to strengthen K-12 science and math
education by promoting a vision of education as a continuum that
begins with the youngest learners and progresses through adulthood
with teacher training. Among its activities, the program supports
partnerships that unite K-12 schools, institutions of higher education
and private industry.
Congress took the president's suggestion and authorized an MSP
program at the National Science Foundation (NSF) and another partnership
program at the Department of Education in 2002. These two acts of
Congress were meant to fund two different types of partnerships
to achieve the overall goal of highly qualified math and science
teachers ensuring that all students have the basic knowledge to
compete in the ever changing and competitive job market. The funds
allocated for the NSF's MSPs go to the highest quality proposals
chosen through a competitive peer-reviewed grant program. The program
focuses on modeling, testing and identification of effective math-science
activities. The funds allocated for the Department of Education
MSPs go directly to the states as formula grants, providing funds
to all states to replicate and then implement the best of the NSF
partnerships throughout the country. Once states receive the money,
they make competitive grants to local partnerships.
It is essential that highly qualified science teachers develop
the energetic, eager and curious next generation of scientists and
engineers. Skilled geoscientists and geoengineers, in particular,
are needed to find, develop and maintain our energy, agricultural,
water and air resources, to understand and mitigate natural hazards
and to ensure an educated public with a general understanding of
the Earth environment to enhance our public and private quality
of life.
AGI is a nonprofit federation of 42 geoscientific and professional
societies representing more than 100,000 geologists, geophysicists,
and other Earth scientists. Founded in 1948, AGI provides information
services to geoscientists, serves as a voice for shared interests
in our profession, plays a major role in strengthening geoscience
education, and strives to increase public awareness of the vital
role the geosciences play in society's use of resources and interaction
with the environment.
At a hearing in October 2003, the House Science Committee found
that these new partnership programs are "on the right track
toward improving math and science education." Testifying before
the committee, M. Susana Navarro, executive director of the El Paso
Collaborative for Academic Excellence MSP, said: "What the
MSP now provides is an opportunity to bring together partners across
the community, K-16, toward the shared development and implementation
of high quality math and science content and instructional practices
aimed at improving student achievement among all students."
When President Bush released his budget proposal for fiscal year
2005 (FY05), the proposal phased out the NSF partnership programs
and shifted the funding to the MSP companion program at the Department
of Education. However, the $120 million increase requested for 2005
was not slated to fund additional MSPs on the local level; instead
it would have financed a new program focused on accelerating the
math education of secondary-school students, especially those who
are at risk of dropping out of school because they lack basic skills
in math.
Ultimately, Congress did not choose to fund math over science.
In last year's omnibus bill, the Math and Science Partnership budget
increased 16 percent over FY04 levels to $179 million and none of
those funds were set-aside for one subject.
This year, the President has proposed something similar. The FY06
budget proposal increases the MSPs to $269 million, an increase
of $90.4 million, or 51 percent, over the FY05 level. Although a
large increase has been proposed, the President's plan restricts
$120 million for the Secondary Education Mathematics Initiative,
a competitive grants program to be administered by the Department
of Education. This creates a net decrease in funding available to
the states in FY06 compared to the FY05 allocations.
The $120 million in funds for Secondary Education Mathematics Initiative
is part of the overall High School Initiative, which will expand
the application of No Child Left Behind principles to improve high
school education and raise achievement, particularly the achievement
of students most at risk of failure. This new initiative combines
a number of categorical programs in order to give states and districts
more flexibility and contains stronger accountability mechanisms.
AGI believes the two MSPs are the most effective approach to rapidly
improving the abilities of all students to enhance their future
prospects regardless of their ultimate career goals. The two programs,
designed and authorized by Congress, are complementary. AGI supports
funding at NSF for competitive grants for teaching tools and teacher
training and funding at the Department of Education for formula
grants for implementation of these tools in K-12 education. The
peer-review process in the NSF program should be safeguarded as
should the formula grants for all states as administered by the
Department of Education. Moreover, the program within the Department
of Education should not suffer a net reduction in funding in order
to support a new initiative for mathematics. These funds should
serve the Math and Science Partnership with no earmarks or set-asides.
Thank you for the opportunity to present this testimony to the
Subcommittee. If you would like any additional information, please
contact me at 703-379-2480, ext. 228 voice, 703-379-7563 fax, rowan@agiweb.org,
or 4220 King Street, Alexandria VA 22302-1502.
Please send any comments or requests for information to AGI Government Affairs Program.
Posted: May 12, 2005
|