AGI Fiscal Year 2007 Testimony to Senate Subcommittee
on Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations
Written Testimony Submitted by
Linda Rowan, Director of Government Affairs
American Geological Institute
to the United States Senate
Subcommittee on Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations
April 28, 2006
Thank you for this opportunity to provide the American Geological
Institute's perspective on fiscal year (FY) 2007 appropriations
for geoscience programs within the Subcommittee's jurisdiction.
We ask the Subcommittee to support the well-informed, yet fiscally
responsible increases in the Administration's budget proposal for
the Minerals Management Services (MMS), the Bureau of Land Management's
Energy and Mineral Management program and the Smithsonian Institution.
AGI also supports new funding for fixed costs and a few high priority
programs within the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The
high priority programs include a new Integrated Multi-Hazards Demonstration
Project, the National Streamflow Information Program, the Energy
Resources Program and some new funding for the Landsat Continuity
Mission.
Regrettably, the Administration also proposes significant cuts
to the USGS mineral resources and water programs. If the President's
request were enacted, the USGS would receive a total budget of only
$945 million, a 2% decrease compared to last year's funding, while
the Mineral Resources Program would receive a $22 million cut, leaving
the program with only about $30 million in FY 2007 and the Water
Resources Program would be cut by about $7.4 million. If enacted,
these reductions would hamper the Survey's ability to carry out
its important objectives to monitor environmental conditions and
provide resource assessments for economic development and national
security. The value of domestically processed nonfuel mineral resources
is estimated to be about $478 billion and the USGS Mineral Resources
Program is the only entity, public or private, that provides an
analysis and assessment of the raw materials and processed minerals
accessible from domestic and global markets. Specifically, we ask
the Subcommittee to restore funds to the Mineral Resources Program
and the Water Resources Program and to support a $1.2 billion overall
budget for USGS. This budget would allow essential, but consistently
under funded, programs throughout the agency to fulfill their basic
mission and such a request is supported by the 69 organizations
of the USGS Coalition. AGI is a charter member of the USGS Coalition.
For the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the proposed FY
2007 is $7.3 billion, a 5.1% decrease from last year with significant
cuts for state water programs. AGI supports full funding for water
programs in EPA and USGS, given the importance of clean and readily
available water for our citizens, industries, local to federal government
agencies and the environment.
AGI is a nonprofit federation of 44 geoscientific and professional
associations that represent more than 100,000 geologists, geophysicists,
and other earth scientists who work in industry, academia and government.
The institute serves as a voice for shared interests in our profession,
plays a major role in strengthening geoscience education, and strives
to increase public awareness of the vital role that the geosciences
play in society's use of resources and interaction with the environment.
U.S. Geological Survey
For the fifth year in a row, the USGS faces cuts in the Administration's
request. AGI thanks the Subcommittee for its record of restoring
critical funds and recognizing the Survey's essential value to the
nation. The USGS is a critical federal science agency and it should
receive increased funding like the proposed increases in the President's
American Competitiveness Initiative for the National Science Foundation
and the Office of Science within the Department of Energy. The USGS
performs complementary research, analysis and education and should
be part of the President's initiative to advance innovation, reduce
imported oil dependencies and ensure American competitiveness in
science and technology.
Virtually every American citizen and every federal, state, and
local agency benefits either directly or indirectly from USGS products
and services. As was made clear by the National Research Council
report Future Roles and Opportunities for the U.S. Geological Survey,
the USGS's value to the nation goes well beyond the Department of
the Interior's stewardship mission for public lands. USGS information
and expertise address a wide range of important problems facing
this nation: earthquakes and floods, global environmental change,
water availability, waste disposal, and availability of energy and
mineral resources. Some of the most important activities of the
Survey serve the entire nation. At the same time, AGI recognizes
that the Survey does have a responsibility to provide scientific
support for its sister land management agencies at Interior, an
important mission that needs to be well executed if land management
decisions are to be made with the best available scientific information.
It is imperative that these missions be recognized and valued within
the Department and by the Administration. AGI asks the Subcommittee
to continue its efforts to help the Administration better understand
the Survey's value to the nation as a whole
Mineral Resources Program. This highly regarded research
program is the nation's premier credible source for regional, national
and global mineral resource and mineral environmental assessments,
statistics and research critical for sound economic, mineral-supply,
land-use and environmental analysis, planning and decision-making.
AGI urges the Subcommittee to reject the Administration's requested
cuts to this program and to fund it at the FY 2005 appropriated
level of $54 million. The huge cut, leaving the program with less
than $30 million in FY 2007 would decimate the program. It would
cost about 240 full time positions and would eliminate or reduce
global mineral resource assessments of mineral commodities, research
on industrial minerals, research on inorganic toxins, materials
flow analyses, and the Minerals Resources External Research program.
The essence of the program would be jeopardized at a time when mineral
products account for a rapidly growing and valuable commodity of
the U.S. economy.
The Mineral Resources Program (MRP) has 6 divisions with offices
across the U.S. working on a broad range of initiatives to secure
the nation's economic base and environmental welfare. Each month,
the Minerals Information Services of the MRP responds to over 2,000
telephone inquiries and more than 90,000 email or facsimile inquiries
from the federal government, state agencies, domestic and foreign
agencies, foreign governments and the general public. Cutting-edge
research by MRP scientists investigates the role of microbes in
the geochemical cycles of arsenic, mercury, lead and zinc to understand
the transport and accumulation of health-threatening toxins related
to these elements and to distinguish their natural or anthropogenic
sources. MRP scientists also investigated and prepared a report
on the asbestos-bearing debris in the aftermath of the World Trade
Center disaster. The Global Mineral Resource Assessment Project
of the MRP provides unbiased and timely information about the current
and future availability of mineral resources around the world, which
is needed to understand and anticipate economic, health, environmental
and political factors that will affect how these resources are used
in this increasingly interconnected world.
The data and analyses of the MRP are used by the Department of
the Interior, Department of Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency,
the Department of State, the Federal Reserve, other federal, state
and local government entities, foreign governments, private companies
and the general public. Analyses based on the MRP data are essential
for guiding economic and environmental policy and for providing
options for land use decisions posed by industry, government and
private land owners. We urge the Subcommittee to restore the Mineral
Resources Program to its FY 2005 level of $54 million so that it
may perform its core missions effectively and efficiently.
National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program. AGI is encouraged
by the Administration's continued requests for small annual increases
for the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (the FY 2007
request is for $25.4 million) and values Congress' past support
for much larger increases. This important partnership between the
USGS, state geological surveys, and universities provides the nation
with fundamental data for addressing natural hazard mitigation,
environmental remediation, land-use planning, and resource development.
The program was authorized (P.L. 106-148) to grow by about 10% to
20% per year from a starting level of $28 million in 1999 to $64
million in 2005. Re-authorization at $64 million per year over the
next 5 years is currently being considered in Congress. AGI strongly
supports the increased funding being considered by Congress because
the program provides a timely basis for assessing water availability
and quality, risks from hazards and other major land and resource-use
issues that are of increasing prominence in many states.
Natural Hazards. A key role for the USGS is providing the
research, monitoring, and assessment that are critically needed
to better prepare for and respond to natural hazards. The tragic
earthquake/tsunami in the Indian Ocean, hurricanes Katrina and Rita
striking the Gulf Coast and the massive earthquake in Pakistan,
remind us of the need for preparation, education, mitigation and
rapid response to natural hazards. A 2006 National Academies report
entitled Improved Seismic Monitoring estimates that increased seismic
monitoring leads to increased future savings from the damaging effects
of potential earthquakes. Given recent events and this timely report,
AGI strongly supports the Administration's request for increased
funding for Earthquake, Volcano and Landslide Hazards and appreciates
Congress' past support for these programs. With great forethought,
the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Authorization Act of 1999 called
for a significant federal investment in expansion and modernization
of existing seismic networks and for the development of the Advanced
National Seismic System (ANSS) -- a nationwide network of shaking
measurement systems focused on urban areas. ANSS can provide real-time
earthquake information to emergency responders as well as building
and ground shaking data for engineers and scientists seeking to
understand earthquake processes. ANSS has been allocated about 10%
of its authorized funding level per year, which is not nearly enough
to deploy the 7,000 instruments called for in the law. Currently,
66 are operating and there is much more work that needs congressional
support. We would like to commend the Subcommittee for your leadership
in securing previous increases for ANSS and ask for additional increases
in FY 2007. The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP)
was reauthorized in October, 2004 and AGI supports the appropriation
of full funding for this vital program. We hope that all of these
under funded systems will receive additional support to meet their
timely goals of better protection and mitigation of earthquake hazards
long before we need to react.
Water Programs. The president's request calls for the termination
of the Water Resources Research Institutes. AGI strongly encourages
the Subcommittee to oppose these reductions and to fully support
this program at its small, but effective FY 2005 level of $6.4 million.
AGI is pleased that the Administration supports increased funding
for stream gages and the National Streamflow Information program.
Homeland Security. Another troubling aspect of the President's
request is the lack of funding for the USGS activities in support
of homeland security and the war on terrorism overseas. All four
disciplines within the Survey have made and continue to make significant
contributions to these efforts, but the FY 2007 request does not
provide any direct funding. Instead, those costs must be absorbed
in addition to the proposed cuts. AGI encourages the Subcommittee
to recognize the Survey's important role in homeland security and
ensure adequate support for its newfound responsibilities.
Smithsonian Institution
The Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History plays a dual
role in communicating the excitement of the geosciences and enhancing
knowledge through research and preservation of geoscience collections.
AGI asks the Subcommittee to build up Smithsonian research with
steady increases that are a tiny fraction of the overall budget,
but would dramatically improve the facilities and their benefit
to the country. We support the Administration's request for increased
funding for the Smithsonian in FY 2007.
National Park Service
The national parks are very important to the geoscience community
as unique national treasures that showcase the geologic splendor
of our country and offer unparalleled opportunities for both geoscientific
research and education of our fellow citizens. The National Park
Services's Geologic Resources Division was established in 1995 to
provide park managers with geologic expertise. Working in conjunction
with USGS and other partners, the division helps ensure that geoscientists
are becoming part of an integrated approach to science-based resource
management in parks. AGI would like to see additional support for
geological staff positions to adequately address the treasured geologic
resources in the national parks.
Thank you for the opportunity to present this testimony to the
Subcommittee. If you would like any additional information for the
record, please contact me at 703-379-2480, ext. 228 voice, 703-379-7563
fax, rowan@agiweb.org, or 4220 King Street, Alexandria VA 22302-1502.
Please send any comments or requests for information to AGI Government Affairs Program.
Posted: May 22, 2006
|