Written Testimony Submitted by
Linda Rowan, Director of Government Affairs
American Geological Institute
to the United States Senate
Subcommittee on Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations
April 27, 2007
Thank you for this opportunity to provide the American
Geological Institute's perspective on fiscal year (FY) 2008 appropriations
for geoscience programs within the Subcommittee's jurisdiction.
We ask the Subcommittee to support the well-informed, yet fiscally
responsible increases in the Administration's budget proposal
for the Minerals Management Services (MMS), the Bureau of Land
Management's Energy and Mineral Management program and the Smithsonian
Institution. AGI also supports new funding for fixed costs and
a few high priority programs within the United States Geological
Survey (USGS). The high priority programs include a new Integrated
Multi-Hazards Demonstration Project, the National Streamflow Information
Program, the Energy Resources Program and some new funding for
the Landsat Continuity Mission.
Regrettably, the Administration also proposes significant
cuts to the USGS mineral resources and water programs. If the
President's request were enacted, the USGS would receive a total
budget of only $975 million, a 0.3% decrease compared to last
year's funding, while the Mineral Resources Program would receive
a more than $24 million cut, leaving the program with less than
$30 million in FY 2008 and the Water Resources Program would be
cut by about $7 million. If enacted, these reductions would hamper
the Survey's ability to carry out its important objectives to
monitor environmental conditions and provide resource assessments
for economic development and national security. The value of domestically
processed nonfuel mineral resources is estimated to be about $478
billion and growing. The USGS Mineral Resources Program is the
only entity, public or private, that provides an analysis and
assessment of the raw materials and processed minerals accessible
from domestic and global markets. Specifically, we ask the Subcommittee
to restore funds to the Mineral Resources Program and the Water
Resources Program and to support a $1.2 billion overall budget
for USGS. This budget would allow essential, but consistently
under funded, programs throughout the agency to fulfill their
basic mission and such a request is supported by the 70 organizations
of the USGS Coalition. AGI is a charter member of the USGS Coalition.
For the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the
proposed FY 2007 is $7.3 billion, a 5.1% decrease from last year
with significant cuts for state water programs. AGI supports full
funding for water programs in EPA and USGS, given the importance
of clean and readily available water for our citizens, industries,
local to federal government agencies and the environment.
AGI is a nonprofit federation of 44 geoscientific
and professional associations that represent more than 100,000
geologists, geophysicists, and other earth scientists who work
in industry, academia and government. The institute serves as
a voice for shared interests in our profession, plays a major
role in strengthening geoscience education, and strives to increase
public awareness of the vital role that the geosciences play in
society's use of resources and interaction with the environment.
U.S. Geological Survey
For the fifth year in a row, the USGS faces cuts in the Administration's
request. AGI thanks the Subcommittee for its record of restoring
critical funds and recognizing the Survey's essential value to
the nation. The USGS is a critical federal science agency and
it should receive increased funding like the proposed increases
in the President's American Competitiveness Initiative for the
National Science Foundation and the Office of Science within the
Department of Energy. The USGS performs complementary research,
analysis and education and should be part of the President's initiative
to advance innovation, reduce imported oil dependencies and ensure
American competitiveness in science and technology.
Virtually every American citizen and every federal,
state, and local agency benefits either directly or indirectly
from USGS products and services. As was made clear by the National
Research Council report Future Roles and Opportunities for the
U.S. Geological Survey, the USGS's value to the nation goes well
beyond the Department of the Interior's stewardship mission for
public lands. USGS information and expertise address a wide range
of important problems facing this nation: earthquakes and floods,
global environmental change, water availability, waste disposal,
and availability of energy and mineral resources. Some of the
most important activities of the Survey serve the entire nation.
At the same time, AGI recognizes that the Survey does have a responsibility
to provide scientific support for its sister land management agencies
at Interior, an important mission that needs to be well executed
if land management decisions are to be made with the best available
scientific information. It is imperative that these missions be
recognized and valued within the Department and by the Administration.
AGI asks the Subcommittee to continue its efforts to help the
Administration better understand the Survey's value to the nation
as a whole
Mineral Resources Program. This highly regarded
research program is the nation's premier credible source for regional,
national and global mineral resource and mineral environmental
assessments, statistics and research critical for sound economic,
mineral-supply, land-use and environmental analysis, planning
and decision-making. AGI urges the Subcommittee to reject the
Administration's requested cuts to this program and to fund it
at the FY 2005 appropriated level of $54 million. The huge cut,
leaving the program with less than $30 million in FY 2008 would
decimate the program. It would cost about 210 of 380 full time
positions and would eliminate or reduce global mineral resource
assessments of mineral commodities, research on industrial minerals,
research on inorganic toxins, materials flow analyses, and the
Minerals Resources External Research program. The essence of the
program would be jeopardized at a time when mineral products account
for a rapidly growing and valuable commodity of the U.S. economy.
The Mineral Resources Program (MRP) has 6 divisions
with offices across the U.S. working on a broad range of initiatives
to secure the nation's economic base and environmental welfare.
Each month, the Minerals Information Services of the MRP responds
to over 2,000 telephone inquiries and more than 90,000 email or
facsimile inquiries from the federal government, state agencies,
domestic and foreign agencies, foreign governments and the general
public. Cutting-edge research by MRP scientists investigates the
role of microbes in the geochemical cycles of arsenic, mercury,
lead and zinc to understand the transport and accumulation of
health-threatening toxins related to these elements and to distinguish
their natural or anthropogenic sources. MRP scientists also investigated
and prepared a report on the asbestos-bearing debris in the aftermath
of the World Trade Center disaster. The Global Mineral Resource
Assessment Project of the MRP provides unbiased and timely information
about the current and future availability of mineral resources
around the world, which is needed to understand and anticipate
economic, health, environmental and political factors that will
affect how these resources are used in this increasingly interconnected
world.
The data and analyses of the MRP are used by the
Department of the Interior, Department of Defense, the Central
Intelligence Agency, the Department of State, the Federal Reserve,
other federal, state and local government entities, foreign governments,
private companies and the general public. Analyses based on the
MRP data are essential for guiding economic and environmental
policy and for providing options for land use decisions posed
by industry, government and private land owners. We urge the Subcommittee
to restore the Mineral Resources Program to its FY 2005 level
of $54 million so that it may perform its core missions effectively
and efficiently.
National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program. AGI
is encouraged by the Administration's continued requests for small
annual increases for the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping
Program (the FY 2008 request is for $26 million) and values Congress'
past support for much larger increases. This important partnership
between the USGS, state geological surveys, and universities provides
the nation with fundamental data for addressing natural hazard
mitigation, environmental remediation, land-use planning, and
resource development. The program was authorized (P.L. 106-148)
to grow by about 10% to 20% per year from a starting level of
$28 million in 1999 to $64 million in fiscal 2005. Re-authorization
at $64 million per year over the next 5 years is currently being
considered in Congress. AGI strongly supports the increased funding
being considered by Congress because the program provides a timely
basis for assessing water availability and quality, risks from
hazards and other major land and resource-use issues that are
of increasing prominence in many states.
Natural Hazards. A key role for the USGS is providing
the research, monitoring, and assessment that are critically needed
to better prepare for and respond to natural hazards. The tragic
earthquake/tsunami in the Indian Ocean, hurricanes Katrina and
Rita striking the Gulf Coast and the massive earthquake in Pakistan,
remind us of the need for preparation, education, mitigation and
rapid response to natural hazards. A 2006 National Academies report
entitled Improved Seismic Monitoring estimates that increased
seismic monitoring leads to increased future savings from the
damaging effects of potential earthquakes. Given recent events
and this timely report, AGI strongly supports the Administration's
request for increased funding for Earthquake, Volcano and Landslide
Hazards and appreciates Congress' past support for these programs.
With great forethought, the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Authorization
Act of 1999 called for a significant federal investment in expansion
and modernization of existing seismic networks and for the development
of the Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) -- a nationwide
network of shaking measurement systems focused on urban areas.
ANSS can provide real-time earthquake information to emergency
responders as well as building and ground shaking data for engineers
and scientists seeking to understand earthquake processes. ANSS
has been allocated about 10% of its authorized funding level per
year, which is not nearly enough to deploy the 7,000 instruments
called for in the law. Currently, 66 are operating and there is
much more work that needs congressional support. We would like
to commend the Subcommittee for your leadership in securing previous
increases for ANSS and ask for additional increases in FY 2008.
ANSS was authorized to receive $36 million in fiscal 2008 and
the President's request is only for about $8 million. The National
Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) was reauthorized
in October, 2004 and AGI supports the appropriation of full funding
for this vital program. We hope that all of these under funded
systems will receive additional support to meet their timely goals
of better protection and mitigation of earthquake hazards long
before we need to react.
Water Programs. The president's request calls for
the termination of the Water Resources Research Institutes. AGI
strongly encourages the Subcommittee to oppose these reductions
and to fully support this program at its small, but effective
FY 2005 level of $6.4 million. AGI is pleased that the Administration
supports increased funding for stream gages and the National Streamflow
Information program.
Homeland Security. Another troubling aspect of the
President's request is the lack of funding for the USGS activities
in support of homeland security and the war on terrorism overseas.
All four disciplines within the Survey have made and continue
to make significant contributions to these efforts, but the FY
2008 request does not provide any direct funding. Instead, those
costs must be absorbed in addition to the proposed cuts. AGI encourages
the Subcommittee to recognize the Survey's important role in homeland
security and ensure adequate support for its newfound responsibilities.
Smithsonian Institution
The Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History plays a dual
role in communicating the excitement of the geosciences and enhancing
knowledge through research and preservation of geoscience collections.
AGI asks the Subcommittee to build up Smithsonian research with
steady increases that are a tiny fraction of the overall budget,
but would dramatically improve the facilities and their benefit
to the country. We support increased funding for Smithsonian research
in FY 2008.
National Park Service
The national parks are very important to the geoscience community
as unique national treasures that showcase the geologic splendor
of our country and offer unparalleled opportunities for both geoscientific
research and education of our fellow citizens. The National Park
Services's Geologic Resources Division was established in 1995
to provide park managers with geologic expertise. Working in conjunction
with USGS and other partners, the division helps ensure that geoscientists
are becoming part of an integrated approach to science-based resource
management in parks. AGI would like to see additional support
for geological staff positions to adequately address the treasured
geologic resources in the national parks.
Thank you for the opportunity to present this testimony
to the Subcommittee. If you would like any additional information
for the record, please contact me at 703-379-2480, ext. 228 voice,
703-379-7563 fax, rowan@agiweb.org, or 4220 King Street, Alexandria
VA 22302-1502.